CVE-2024-41714
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the Web Interface component of Mitel MiCollab through 9.8 SP1 (9.8.1.5) and MiVoice Business Solution Virtual Instance (MiVB SVI) through 1.0.0.27 could allow an authenticated attacker to conduct a command injection attack, due to insufficient parameter sanitization. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands with elevated privileges within the context of the system.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMitel MiCollab and MiVoice Business Solution Virtual Instance contain a command injection vulnerability in their Web Interface components. An authenticated attacker can inject arbitrary operating system commands through insufficiently sanitized web interface parameters, leading to execution with elevated (likely root or administrator) privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 9.8.1.5<= 1.0.0.27CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Mitel productDetermine if Mitel MiCollab or MiVoice Business Solution Virtual Instance is installed in your environment. Look for Mitel-related services, applications, or documentation.Affected if Either product is present on the system
-
Check MiCollab versionLocate and inspect the installed version of MiCollab. Common methods include checking the application GUI, administrative console, or system information files provided by Mitel.Affected if The installed version is 9.8.1.5 or earlier
-
Check MiVoice Business Solution Virtual Instance versionLocate and inspect the installed version of MiVB SVI. Check the virtual appliance management interface or system documentation for version information.Affected if The installed version is 1.0.0.27 or earlier
-
Verify Web Interface component statusDetermine whether the web interface components for MiCollab or MiVB are enabled and accessible. This may be configurable in the administrative console or system settings.Affected if The web interface is enabled and accessible
-
Assess web interface network exposureReview network configuration to determine if the web interface is exposed beyond the internal network or to untrusted users.Affected if The web interface is externally accessible or accessible to untrusted users
You are affected if either MiCollab version 9.8.1.5 or earlier or MiVB SVI version 1.0.0.27 or earlier is installed with the web interface component enabled and accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor-provided security patch for the affected MiCollab (9.8 SP1 and earlier) and MiVB SVI (1.0.0.27 and earlier) versions. Restrict web interface access to trusted users and monitor for anomalous command activity.
MiCollab 9.8.1.6 or later; MiVoice Business Solution Virtual Instance 1.0.0.28 or later
- 1. Obtain the latest patched version of MiCollab (version 9.8.1.6 or later) from Mitel's official support portal at www.mitel.com
- 2. Review Mitel's release notes and upgrade documentation for any specific migration requirements
- 3. Schedule a maintenance window and create a full backup of the current system
- 4. Follow Mitel's documented upgrade procedure to apply the patched version
- 5. After upgrade, verify the web interface is accessible and confirm the version number reflects the patched release
- 6. Test that previously vulnerable parameter inputs are now properly sanitized
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,080.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-41714 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-41714 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data