CVE-2024-43108
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe goTenna Pro ATAK Plugin uses AES CTR type encryption for short, encrypted messages without any additional integrity checking mechanisms. This leaves messages malleable to an attacker that can access the message. It is advised to continue to use encryption in the plugin and update to the current release for enhanced encryption protocols.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe goTenna Pro ATAK Plugin uses AES CTR (Counter) mode for message encryption without any integrity verification mechanism (such as MAC, HMAC, or authenticated encryption). This allows attackers with message access to perform bit-flipping attacks, modifying encrypted content without detection due to the lack of authentication tags.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.0.7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify goTenna Pro ATAK Plugin versionOpen ATAK and navigate to the plugin management section. Find goTenna Pro ATAK Plugin in the list of installed plugins and note the version number displayed.Affected if The displayed version is less than 2.0.7 (e.g., 2.0.6, 2.0.5, 1.x.x)
-
Verify encryption is in useCheck the goTenna Pro plugin settings or communication configuration. Look for encryption mode settings, typically found under message encryption, link encryption, or security settings within the plugin configuration menu.Affected if AES CTR mode encryption is enabled or selected as the encryption method
-
Confirm integrity verification is absentInspect the plugin security or encryption settings for any message authentication configuration. Look for options labeled MAC, HMAC, message integrity, authentication tag, or authenticated encryption (GCM, CCM). Check if these are disabled, missing, or not present.Affected if No MAC, HMAC, or authenticated encryption mode (such as GCM) is configured or available in the plugin settings
-
Check for bit-flipping vulnerability exposureIf possible, capture and inspect outgoing messages from the plugin using a network analyzer or debug tool. Examine the encrypted payload for the absence of an authentication tag or integrity checksum at the end of the ciphertext.Affected if Encrypted messages contain no detectable authentication tag or integrity check value
You are affected if the installed goTenna Pro ATAK Plugin version is below 2.0.7 AND AES CTR encryption is in use without any MAC, HMAC, or authenticated encryption providing integrity verification.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.0.7
Update to the current release of the goTenna Pro ATAK Plugin which includes enhanced encryption protocols with built-in integrity checking. If current version must be used, implement additional message authentication (e.g., HMAC) before transmitting.
2.0.7
- Obtain the goTenna Pro ATAK Plugin version 2.0.7 or later from the official goTenna distribution channel
- Uninstall the current version of the goTenna Pro ATAK Plugin from your ATAK instance
- Install version 2.0.7 of the goTenna Pro ATAK Plugin
- Verify the installed version matches 2.0.7 or later in the plugin settings
- Test message encryption functionality to confirm the enhanced encryption protocols are operational
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,328.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-43108 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-43108 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data