CVE-2024-45374
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe goTenna Pro ATAK plugin uses a weak password for sharing encryption keys via the key broadcast method. If the broadcasted encryption key is captured over RF, and password is cracked via brute force attack, it is possible to decrypt it and use it to decrypt all future and past messages sent via encrypted broadcast with that particular key. This only applies when the key is broadcasted over RF. This is an optional feature, so it is advised to use local QR encryption key sharing for additional security on this and previous versions.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe goTenna Pro ATAK plugin employs a weak password mechanism when broadcasting encryption keys over RF (radio frequency). An attacker who captures the RF transmission can brute-force the weak password to recover the encryption key, enabling decryption of all past and future messages encrypted with that key.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.0.7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify goTenna Pro ATAK plugin installationNavigate to the ATAK plugin management menu and confirm the goTenna Pro plugin is listed as installedAffected if The plugin is installed and visible in the plugin list
-
Check installed plugin versionIn ATAK, go to Settings > Plugins > goTenna Pro and note the version number displayedAffected if The version shown is less than 2.0.7 or the version cannot be determined (older installation)
-
Locate RF key broadcast settingIn ATAK, go to Settings > goTenna Pro > Encryption or Key Management and look for options related to RF key distribution or key broadcastAffected if An RF key broadcast or RF key distribution option exists and is currently enabled
-
Inspect RF transmission logsCheck the goTenna Pro plugin logs or device event logs for entries indicating RF transmission of encryption keys (keywords: key broadcast, key exchange, RF key, key distribution)Affected if Logs contain records of encryption keys being transmitted over RF
A user is affected if the goTenna Pro ATAK plugin version is below 2.0.7 and the RF key broadcast feature has been enabled, allowing potential capture and brute-force of encryption keys from RF transmissions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.0.7
Disable the RF key broadcast feature and use local QR code-based encryption key sharing instead, which provides stronger security for key exchange.
2.0.7
- Upgrade goTenna Pro ATAK plugin to version 2.0.7 or later to obtain the fixed release
- As an additional security measure on any version, use local QR encryption key sharing instead of RF key broadcast method
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-45374 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-45374 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data