CVE-2024-45115
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Commerce versions 2.4.7-p2, 2.4.6-p7, 2.4.5-p9, 2.4.4-p10 and earlier are affected by an Improper Authentication vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain unauthorized access or elevated privileges within the application. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAdobe Commerce contains an improper authentication vulnerability allowing unauthorized attackers to bypass authentication mechanisms and escalate privileges to administrator levels. The flaw affects multiple supported versions (2.4.4-p10 through 2.4.7-p2) and can be exploited without any user interaction, making it highly exploitable in automated attacks.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versions= 2.3.7= 2.4.0= 2.4.1= 2.4.2= 2.4.3= 2.4.4= 2.4.5= 2.4.6= 2.4.7= 1.3.3= 1.3.4= 1.3.5= 1.4.2all versions= 2.4.3= 2.4.4= 2.4.5= 2.4.6= 2.4.7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed Adobe Commerce versionRun the command 'php bin/magento --version' from the Magento root directory, or check the version.php file in app/Magento/ and the composer.json fileAffected if The installed version is 2.4.4-p10, 2.4.5-p9, 2.4.6-p7, or 2.4.7-p2 or earlier within the 2.4.4 through 2.4.7 release families, or matches any of the specific affected versions listed (2.3.7, 2.4.0 through 2.4.3, etc.)
-
Confirm patch levelCheck the applied patches by reviewing the app/etc/config.php file or running 'bin/magento module:status' to verify if security patch APSB24-18 has been appliedAffected if The system is running a version that predates patches 2.4.4-p11, 2.4.5-p10, 2.4.6-p8, or 2.4.7-p3 and no corresponding security patch has been installed
-
Audit administrator accounts for unauthorized creationLog into the admin panel and navigate to System > Permissions > All Users, or query the admin_user database table directly, to review all accounts with administrator privilegesAffected if Any administrator account exists that was not created by known, authorized personnel, or if the total number of admin accounts exceeds expectations
-
Review authentication logs for anomaly patternsExamine logs in var/log/ directory (especially authentication.log, exception.log, or webserver access logs) for failed authentication attempts followed by successful admin access from unfamiliar IP addresses or API token usageAffected if Logs show authentication bypass patterns such as successful admin access immediately after failed attempts, access from unexpected IP addresses, or API calls that bypassed normal login flows
The environment is affected if it runs any Adobe Commerce or Magento version from 2.4.4-p10 through 2.4.7-p2 (or older versions like 2.3.7 through 2.4.3) without the APSB24-18 security patch applied.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor-supplied security patches (Adobe Security Bulletin APSB24-18) to upgrade to versions 2.4.4-p11, 2.4.5-p10, 2.4.6-p8, and 2.4.7-p3 or later. After patching, verify that authentication workflows function correctly and conduct privilege audits to confirm unauthorized elevated accounts do not exist.
Upgrade to the latest patch for your release line: 2.4.4-p10, 2.4.5-p9, 2.4.6-p7, or 2.4.7-p2 (or later)
- 1. Identify your current Adobe Commerce/Magento version by running: bin/magento --version
- 2. Determine which release line you are on (2.4.4, 2.4.5, 2.4.6, or 2.4.7)
- 3. For 2.4.4.x users: Upgrade to version 2.4.4-p10 or later
- 4. For 2.4.5.x users: Upgrade to version 2.4.5-p9 or later
- 5. For 2.4.6.x users: Upgrade to version 2.4.6-p7 or later
- 6. For 2.4.7.x users: Upgrade to version 2.4.7-p2 or later
- 7. After upgrade, clear the cache: bin/magento cache:flush
- 8. Verify the upgrade was successful: bin/magento --version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing10.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,504.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-45115 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-45115 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data