CVE-2024-45157
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in Mbed TLS before 2.28.9 and 3.x before 3.6.1, in which the user-selected algorithm is not used. Unlike previously documented, enabling MBEDTLS_PSA_HMAC_DRBG_MD_TYPE does not cause the PSA subsystem to use HMAC_DRBG: it uses HMAC_DRBG only when MBEDTLS_PSA_CRYPTO_EXTERNAL_RNG and MBEDTLS_CTR_DRBG_C are disabled.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn Mbed TLS before versions 2.28.9 and 3.6.1, the PSA crypto subsystem does not correctly honor the MBEDTLS_PSA_HMAC_DRBG_MD_TYPE configuration option. Instead of using HMAC_DRBG when this option is enabled, the subsystem only uses HMAC_DRBG when BOTH MBEDTLS_PSA_CRYPTO_EXTERNAL_RNG and MBEDTLS_CTR_DRBG_C are disabled. This causes users who expect HMAC_DRBG to unknowingly use CTR_DRBG instead, potentially leading to weaker random number generation than intended.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2.26.0, < 2.28.9>= 3.2.0, < 3.6.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed Mbed TLS versionCheck the version header file (e.g., include/mbedtls/version.h) or the library binary metadata for the exact version numberAffected if The version is >= 2.26.0 and < 2.28.9, or >= 3.2.0 and < 3.6.1
-
Verify if MBEDTLS_PSA_HMAC_DRBG_MD_TYPE is configuredInspect the build configuration files (mbedtls_config.h or config.h) or preprocessor defines for MBEDTLS_PSA_HMAC_DRBG_MD_TYPE being set to a message digest algorithm identifier (e.g., MBEDTLS_MD_SHA256)Affected if This option is enabled and the version falls in the affected range
-
Check the status of MBEDTLS_PSA_CRYPTO_EXTERNAL_RNGSearch the build configuration for MBEDTLS_PSA_CRYPTO_EXTERNAL_RNG being defined/enabledAffected if This option is disabled (commented out or not defined)
-
Check the status of MBEDTLS_CTR_DRBG_CSearch the build configuration for MBEDTLS_CTR_DRBG_C being defined/enabledAffected if This option is enabled
-
Determine if the problematic combination existsReview the configuration: if MBEDTLS_PSA_HMAC_DRBG_MD_TYPE is set, MBEDTLS_PSA_CRYPTO_EXTERNAL_RNG is disabled, and MBEDTLS_CTR_DRBG_C is enabled, then HMAC_DRBG is NOT being used despite the expectationAffected if All three conditions are true: HMAC_DRBG MD type configured, external RNG disabled, CTR_DRBG enabled - this means the weaker CTR_DRBG is being used instead of HMAC_DRBG
You are affected if you have an affected Mbed TLS version, enabled MBEDTLS_PSA_HMAC_DRBG_MD_TYPE, but have MBEDTLS_PSA_CRYPTO_EXTERNAL_RNG disabled and MBEDTLS_CTR_DRBG_C enabled, resulting in unintended CTR_DRBG usage instead of HMAC_DRBG.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.28.93.6.1
Upgrade Mbed TLS to version 2.28.9, 3.6.1, or later. For immediate mitigation, ensure MBEDTLS_PSA_CRYPTO_EXTERNAL_RNG is enabled if HMAC_DRBG is required, and carefully review build configurations to verify the intended DRBG implementation is actually being used.
Mbed TLS 2.28.9 or 3.6.1 (depending on your major version branch)
- 1. Identify the currently installed Mbed TLS version using your package manager or by checking the version.h header file
- 2. For Mbed TLS 2.x versions: upgrade to version 2.28.9 or later
- 3. For Mbed TLS 3.x versions: upgrade to version 3.6.1 or later
- 4. If using a package manager (apt, yum, brew, etc.), update the package to the latest available version that includes the fixes
- 5. If building from source, download the appropriate release from the official Mbed TLS repository (github.com/ARMmbed/mbedtls)
- 6. Rebuild any applications that link against Mbed TLS libraries
- 7. Verify the upgrade by checking that MBEDTLS_VERSION_NUMBER macro reflects the new version
- 8. Test that the PSA crypto subsystem now correctly uses HMAC_DRBG when MBEDTLS_PSA_HMAC_DRBG_MD_TYPE is enabled
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-45157 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-45157 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data