Mbnet.mini FirmwareOperating system · Mbconnectline

CVE-2024-45271

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-10-15
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 2.3.1 or later.
See remediation →
80/100
Remediation priority · High
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An unauthenticated local attacker can gain admin privileges by deploying a config file due to improper input validation.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Due to improper input validation in the application's config file handling, an unauthenticated local attacker can deploy a malicious configuration file to escalate privileges to administrator level. The vulnerability allows a local attacker to bypass authentication and gain full administrative access.

MitigationImplement strict input validation and integrity checks on config files before deployment, restrict config file deployment to authorized administrators only, and verify file origins and signatures.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Mbnet.mini FirmwareOperating system
Affected:< 2.3.1
Rex 100 FirmwareOperating system
Affected:< 2.3.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify firmware version
    Access the device admin interface or check system information page. Look for a firmware version field in the About or System Status section.
    Affected if The displayed firmware version is earlier than 2.3.1 (for Mbnet.mini or Rex 100 devices)
  2. Locate configuration file storage
    Browse the device's web interface or check /etc/config or similar directories for configuration files. Look for any uploaded or deployed config files.
    Affected if The device stores or accepts configuration files that can be deployed without authentication
  3. Verify config file deployment method
    Check if there is an upload, import, or deployment feature for configuration files. Examine whether this feature requires authentication.
    Affected if Configuration files can be deployed or imported without requiring admin authentication
  4. Inspect config file permissions
    Review the file permissions on stored configuration files. Check if local users can modify or replace these files.
    Affected if Config files are writable by unauthenticated or low-privilege users

The environment is affected if the device runs firmware version earlier than 2.3.1 and allows unauthenticated configuration file deployment or modification.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 2.3.1 or later
Fixed in 2.3.1
Interim mitigation

Implement strict input validation and integrity checks on config files before deployment, restrict config file deployment to authorized administrators only, and verify file origins and signatures.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

Firmware version 2.3.1 for both Mbnet.mini and Rex 100

  1. Obtain the firmware version 2.3.1 from the vendor (Mbnet.mini or Rex 100 depending on your device)
  2. Access the device management interface or use the vendor-supplied firmware update mechanism
  3. Upload and apply the firmware version 2.3.1 to the affected device
  4. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the firmware version in the device settings
  5. Confirm the device is functioning normally after the update

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Mbnet.mini Firmware Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
28.0 hours of engineering $4,880
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,808.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-45271 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-45271 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data