Mbnet.mini FirmwareOperating system · Mbconnectline

CVE-2024-45274

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-10-15
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 2.3.1 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An unauthenticated remote attacker can execute OS commands via UDP on the device due to missing authentication.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

This vulnerability allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute operating system commands on the affected device by sending specially crafted UDP packets to the device. The root cause is missing authentication enforcement on the UDP service that handles command processing, enabling any attacker on the network to inject and execute arbitrary OS commands without credentials.

MitigationImplement authentication and authorization controls on the UDP service to verify the identity of requesters before processing commands. If UDP service is not essential, disable or restrict it to trusted network segments.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Mbnet.mini FirmwareOperating system
Affected:< 2.3.1
Rex 100 FirmwareOperating system
Affected:< 2.3.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify device model and firmware version
    Access the device through its web interface, serial console, or management interface to retrieve the exact model name and installed firmware version. Compare the firmware version against the affected range: less than 2.3.1
    Affected if The device is a Mbconnectline Mbnet.mini or Helmholz Rex 100 with firmware version below 2.3.1
  2. Locate UDP service ports
    Perform a UDP port scan (using nmap -sU or similar tool) against the device IP address to identify open UDP ports, particularly those associated with the command processing service
    Affected if UDP service ports used for command processing are open and listening on the device
  3. Test unauthenticated command access
    Send a test UDP packet to the device's command service port using a packet crafting tool (such as scapy or hping3) to verify whether the service processes commands without requiring authentication
    Affected if The UDP service accepts and processes commands without any authentication credentials

Device is affected if it is a Mbnet.mini or Rex 100 running firmware below 2.3.1 AND the UDP command service is enabled and accessible without requiring authentication.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 2.3.1 or later
Fixed in 2.3.1
Interim mitigation

Implement authentication and authorization controls on the UDP service to verify the identity of requesters before processing commands. If UDP service is not essential, disable or restrict it to trusted network segments.

Recommended fix High confidence

Firmware 2.3.1 or later for Mbnet.mini and Rex 100

  1. Obtain the official firmware version 2.3.1 or later for your device (Mbnet.mini or Rex 100) from the vendor's official support渠道
  2. Verify the firmware integrity using checksums provided by the vendor if available
  3. Access the device's administrative interface or use the vendor-supplied firmware update tool
  4. Upload and apply the firmware version 2.3.1 to the affected device
  5. Reboot the device as required by the firmware update process
  6. Verify the device is operational and running the patched firmware version

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Mbnet.mini Firmware Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-45274 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-45274 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data