CVE-2024-45731
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Splunk Enterprise for Windows versions below 9.3.1, 9.2.3, and 9.1.6, a low-privileged user that does not hold the "admin" or "power" Splunk roles could write a file to the Windows system root directory, which has a default location in the Windows System32 folder, when Splunk Enterprise for Windows is installed on a separate drive.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA path traversal vulnerability in Splunk Enterprise for Windows allows a low-privileged user (non-admin/non-power role) to write files to the Windows system root directory (System32 folder) when Splunk is installed on a separate drive. This enables privilege escalation by placing malicious files in a privileged system location.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 9.1.0, < 9.1.6>= 9.2.0, < 9.2.3= 9.3.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Splunk Enterprise versionCheck the installed Splunk version by examining the version file in the Splunk installation directory, or run 'splunk --version' from the Splunk bin directoryAffected if The installed version falls within >= 9.1.0 and < 9.1.6, OR >= 9.2.0 and < 9.2.3, OR equals 9.3.0
-
Confirm Windows platformVerify that Splunk Enterprise is running on a Windows operating systemAffected if Splunk is running on Windows (the vulnerability only affects Windows installations)
-
Determine Splunk installation driveCheck which drive letter Splunk is installed on by reviewing the installation pathAffected if Splunk is installed on a drive other than the default Windows system drive (the vulnerability only applies when Splunk is on a separate drive)
-
Identify low-privileged Splunk usersReview Splunk user roles and Windows filesystem permissions for the Splunk installation directory to identify non-admin/non-power role usersAffected if Low-privileged Splunk users exist with write access to Splunk directories that can be traversed to system locations
You are affected if Splunk Enterprise for Windows is running a version between 9.1.0-9.1.5, 9.2.0-9.2.2, or 9.3.0 AND is installed on a separate drive from the Windows system, allowing low-privileged users potential write access to privileged system locations.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped9.1.69.2.3
Upgrade Splunk Enterprise for Windows to version 9.3.1, 9.2.3, or 9.1.6 or later to patch this vulnerability. Alternatively, restrict filesystem permissions for low-privileged Splunk users to prevent write access to system directories.
Minimum: 9.1.6, 9.2.3, or 9.3.1 (depending on current branch)
- 1. Identify the current Splunk Enterprise for Windows version by navigating to Settings > About > About Splunk Enterprise
- 2. Based on current version, upgrade to the minimum fixed release: For 9.1.x branch, upgrade to 9.1.6 or later; For 9.2.x branch, upgrade to 9.2.3 or later; For 9.3.0, upgrade to 9.3.1 or later
- 3. Download the appropriate installer from splunk.com/products/splunk/downloads
- 4. Stop the Splunk Enterprise service before upgrading: Run 'splunk stop' from the Splunk bin directory
- 5. Run the installer with appropriate administrator privileges
- 6. Start Splunk Enterprise after upgrade completes: Run 'splunk start' from the Splunk bin directory
- 7. Verify the upgrade by checking the version in Settings > About > About Splunk Enterprise
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-45731 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-45731 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data