CVE-2024-46666
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn allocation of resources without limits or throttling [CWE-770] vulnerability in FortiOS versions 7.6.0, versions 7.4.4 through 7.4.0, 7.2 all versions, 7.0 all versions, 6.4 all versions may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to prevent access to the GUI via specially crafted requests directed at specific endpoints.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA resource exhaustion vulnerability in FortiOS allows remote unauthenticated attackers to send specially crafted requests to specific GUI endpoints, causing excessive resource allocation that prevents GUI access. This is a denial-of-service condition affecting the web-based management interface.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.4.0, < 7.2.9>= 7.4.0, < 7.4.5= 7.6.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed FortiOS versionRun the command 'get system status' or 'fortios -v' via CLI to retrieve the firmware version. Alternatively, log into the GUI and check System > Firmware & General > FortiGuard for the current version.Affected if The version number falls within 6.4.0 to 7.2.8, 7.4.0 to 7.4.4, or equals 7.6.0.
-
Confirm GUI interface is enabled and accessibleRun 'get system interface | grep -A 5 mgmt' or check System > Network > Interfaces in the GUI to verify the management interface has 'HTTPS' service enabled and is bound to a reachable network.Affected if The GUI (HTTPS service) is enabled on any interface that is reachable from untrusted networks.
-
Check external access exposure to GUIReview the interface binding configuration via 'show system interface' CLI command or System > Network > Interfaces in the GUI. Look for 'set allowaccess https' on interfaces with external IP addresses or in untrusted zones.Affected if The management interface with HTTPS enabled is assigned to a zone or IP range accessible from the internet or untrusted internal networks.
-
Inspect existing rate limiting configurationRun 'get firewall profile6' or check Policy & Objects > Traffic Shapers to see if any rate-limiting or connection-filters are applied to management traffic.Affected if No rate limiting is configured for GUI management traffic, leaving the interface vulnerable to excessive request attacks.
You are affected if your FortiOS version falls within the listed vulnerable ranges AND the GUI management interface is exposed and reachable from networks where untrusted attackers could send requests.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.2.97.4.5
Apply Fortinet's patch for this vulnerability when available, and consider implementing upstream rate limiting or access controls to limit exposure to the GUI interface from untrusted networks.
FortiOS 7.2.9+ (for 6.4.x/7.0.x/7.2.x) or FortiOS 7.4.5+ (for 7.4.x) or FortiOS 7.6.1+ (for 7.6.0)
- Identify current FortiOS version using 'get system status' or through the GUI dashboard
- For FortiOS 6.4.x: Schedule maintenance window and upgrade to version 7.2.9 or later (recommended: 7.2.x latest)
- For FortiOS 7.0.x: Schedule maintenance window and upgrade to version 7.2.9 or later (recommended: 7.2.x latest)
- For FortiOS 7.2.x: Schedule maintenance window and upgrade to version 7.2.9 or later (recommended: 7.2.x latest)
- For FortiOS 7.4.0-7.4.4: Schedule maintenance window and upgrade to version 7.4.5 or later (recommended: 7.4.x latest)
- For FortiOS 7.6.0: Upgrade to version 7.6.1 or later when available
- Upload new firmware via FortiOS GUI (System > Firmware) or CLI: 'execute upgrade'
- Verify upgrade success and confirm GUI accessibility
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-46666 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-46666 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data