CVE-2024-46766
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ice: move netif_queue_set_napi to rtnl-protected sections Currently, netif_queue_set_napi() is called from ice_vsi_rebuild() that is not rtnl-locked when called from the reset. This creates the need to take the rtnl_lock just for a single function and complicates the synchronization with .ndo_bpf. At the same time, there no actual need to fill napi-to-queue information at this exact point. Fill napi-to-queue information when opening the VSI and clear it when the VSI is being closed. Those routines are already rtnl-locked. Also, rewrite napi-to-queue assignment in a way that prevents inclusion of XDP queues, as this leads to out-of-bounds writes, such as one below. [ +0.000004] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in netif_queue_set_napi+0x1c2/0x1e0 [ +0.000012] Write of size 8 at addr ffff889881727c80 by task bash/7047 [ +0.000006] CPU: 24 PID: 7047 Comm: bash Not tainted 6.10.0-rc2+ #2 [ +0.000004] Hardware name: Intel Corporation S2600WFT/S2600WFT, BIOS SE5C620.86B.02.01.0014.082620210524 08/26/2021 [ +0.000003] Call Trace: [ +0.000003] <TASK> [ +0.000002] dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0x80 [ +0.000007] print_report+0xce/0x630 [ +0.000007] ? __pfx__raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x10/0x10 [ +0.000007] ? __virt_addr_valid+0x1c9/0x2c0 [ +0.000005] ? netif_queue_set_napi+0x1c2/0x1e0 [ +0.000003] kasan_report+0xe9/0x120 [ +0.000004] ? netif_queue_set_napi+0x1c2/0x1e0 [ +0.000004] netif_queue_set_napi+0x1c2/0x1e0 [ +0.000005] ice_vsi_close+0x161/0x670 [ice] [ +0.000114] ice_dis_vsi+0x22f/0x270 [ice] [ +0.000095] ice_pf_dis_all_vsi.constprop.0+0xae/0x1c0 [ice] [ +0.000086] ice_prepare_for_reset+0x299/0x750 [ice] [ +0.000087] pci_dev_save_and_disable+0x82/0xd0 [ +0.000006] pci_reset_function+0x12d/0x230 [ +0.000004] reset_store+0xa0/0x100 [ +0.000006] ? __pfx_reset_store+0x10/0x10 [ +0.000002] ? __pfx_mutex_lock+0x10/0x10 [ +0.000004] ? __check_object_size+0x4c1/0x640 [ +0.000007] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x30b/0x4a0 [ +0.000006] vfs_write+0x5d6/0xdf0 [ +0.000005] ? fd_install+0x180/0x350 [ +0.000005] ? __pfx_vfs_write+0x10/0xA10 [ +0.000004] ? do_fcntl+0x52c/0xcd0 [ +0.000004] ? kasan_save_track+0x13/0x60 [ +0.000003] ? kasan_save_free_info+0x37/0x60 [ +0.000006] ksys_write+0xfa/0x1d0 [ +0.000003] ? __pfx_ksys_write+0x10/0x10 [ +0.000002] ? __x64_sys_fcntl+0x121/0x180 [ +0.000004] ? _raw_spin_lock+0x87/0xe0 [ +0.000005] do_syscall_64+0x80/0x170 [ +0.000007] ? _raw_spin_lock+0x87/0xe0 [ +0.000004] ? __pfx__raw_spin_lock+0x10/0x10 [ +0.000003] ? file_close_fd_locked+0x167/0x230 [ +0.000005] ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x7d/0x220 [ +0.000005] ? do_syscall_64+0x8c/0x170 [ +0.000004] ? do_syscall_64+0x8c/0x170 [ +0.000003] ? do_syscall_64+0x8c/0x170 [ +0.000003] ? fput+0x1a/0x2c0 [ +0.000004] ? filp_close+0x19/0x30 [ +0.000004] ? do_dup2+0x25a/0x4c0 [ +0.000004] ? __x64_sys_dup2+0x6e/0x2e0 [ +0.000002] ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x7d/0x220 [ +0.000004] ? do_syscall_64+0x8c/0x170 [ +0.000003] ? __count_memcg_events+0x113/0x380 [ +0.000005] ? handle_mm_fault+0x136/0x820 [ +0.000005] ? do_user_addr_fault+0x444/0xa80 [ +0.000004] ? clear_bhb_loop+0x25/0x80 [ +0.000004] ? clear_bhb_loop+0x25/0x80 [ +0.000002] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ +0.000005] RIP: 0033:0x7f2033593154
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysisThe program writes past the bounds of a buffer, overwriting adjacent memory an attacker can turn to their advantage. Crafted input can overwrite control data and redirect execution. Remediation is validating every index and length before a write, plus modern memory-safety mitigations.
General guidance for the out-of-bounds write class — the official description and references above are authoritative for this specific CVE. Want a bespoke review and a reviewed fix? Ask our team →
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.8, < 6.10.10= 6.11CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.10.10
Linux Kernel 6.10.10 or later, or Linux Kernel 6.12 or later
- Identify the currently running kernel version using `uname -r`
- Check if the running kernel version is affected (6.8 <= version < 6.10.10 or version 6.11)
- Schedule a maintenance window for the kernel upgrade
- Update the Linux kernel package to version 6.10.10 or later, or to version 6.12 or later using your distribution's package manager (e.g., `apt update && apt upgrade`, `yum update`, or `dnf upgrade`)
- Reboot the system to load the new kernel
- Verify the new kernel version is loaded using `uname -r` and confirm it is no longer in the affected version range
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-46766 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-46766 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data