Fluent SupportWordPress extension · Wpmanageninja
CVE-2024-47302
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authorization vulnerability in Shahjahan Jewel Fluent Support fluent-support allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Fluent Support: from n/a through <= 1.8.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA Missing Authorization vulnerability in the Fluent Support WordPress plugin (versions <= 1.8.0) allows attackers to exploit incorrectly configured access control security levels. This broken access control enables unauthenticated or unauthorized users to access sensitive functionality or data that should require proper authorization checks.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data
Fluent SupportWordPress extension
< 1.8.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Fluent Support plugin version in WordPress adminNavigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins in the WordPress admin dashboard. Locate 'Fluent Support' in the plugin list and read the version number displayed beneath the plugin name.Affected if The displayed version is 1.8.0 or lower (any version prior to 1.8.1)
-
Check plugin version via filesystemAccess the WordPress installation via FTP or file manager. Navigate to /wp-content/plugins/fluent-support/ and open the main plugin file (usually fluent-support.php or readme.txt). Locate the version string.Affected if The version string shows a number lower than 1.8.1 (for example, 1.8.0, 1.7.5, etc.)
If the installed Fluent Support plugin version is anything below 1.8.1, the environment is affected by this missing authorization vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.8.1
Upgrade Fluent Support to the latest version and audit all access control configurations to ensure proper authorization checks are enforced on all sensitive endpoints and functions.
Fluent Support 1.8.1
- Update Fluent Support plugin to version 1.8.1 or later via the WordPress plugin repository or your site's plugin management interface
- After updating, verify that the plugin is functioning correctly and test that the authorization controls are working as expected
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
Fix this in Fluent Support
Scoped from the published advisory
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-47302 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-47302 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data