CVE-2024-49785
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM watsonx.ai 1.1 through 2.0.3 and IBM watsonx.ai on Cloud Pak for Data 4.8 through 5.0.3 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an authenticated user to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIBM watsonx.ai versions 1.1-2.0.3 and Cloud Pak for Data 4.8-5.0.3 contain a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Web UI. An authenticated attacker can inject arbitrary JavaScript code through user-supplied input that is rendered without proper sanitization, potentially enabling credential theft via session hijacking within trusted user sessions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 1.1, < 2.1.0>= 4.8, < 5.1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed IBM productRun 'ibmcloud ck get' or check the product name in the IBM Cloud Pak for Data administration console. For watsonx.ai, check the deployment details via 'oc get deployments -n <namespace>' or the IBM Cloud Pak UI.Affected if The product is IBM watsonx.ai or Cloud Pak for Data
-
Determine the watsonx.ai versionIn the IBM Cloud Pak for Data web console, navigate to Administration > Instances or check via CLI: 'ibmcloud cpd-cli manage get-version --assembly watsonxai' or inspect the operator deployment YAML for the version label.Affected if Version is 1.1 through 2.0.3 inclusive (or < 2.1.0)
-
Determine the Cloud Pak for Data version (if applicable)Run 'ibmcloud cpd-cli manage get-version --assembly cloud-pak-data' or check the version in the IBM Cloud Pak for Data Administration console under System Information.Affected if Version is 4.8 through 5.0.3 inclusive (or < 5.1.0)
-
Confirm Web UI access is enabledVerify the watsonx.ai or Cloud Pak for Data web UI service is exposed and accessible. Check via 'oc get svc -n <namespace>' and confirm the UI pod is running.Affected if Web UI is exposed and accessible to users
-
Review user input fields in the Web UILog into the watsonx.ai or Cloud Pak for Data Web UI and identify any fields that accept user input and display it back (such as project names, descriptions, or custom labels). These are potential injection points for stored XSS.Affected if User-supplied input fields exist in the UI that may not be properly sanitized
You are affected if you are running watsonx.ai versions 1.1 to < 2.1.0 or Cloud Pak for Data versions 4.8 to < 5.1.0 with the Web UI enabled and users can input data that gets rendered without sanitization.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.1.05.1.0
Apply IBM's security patch for this vulnerability (upgrade to a fixed version if available) and implement strict input validation and output encoding for all user-supplied data rendered in the Web UI to prevent XSS execution.
watsonx.ai: upgrade to 2.1.0 or later; watsonx.ai on Cloud Pak for Data: upgrade to 5.1.0 or later
- Identify which IBM product is affected: watsonx.ai or watsonx.ai on Cloud Pak for Data
- For watsonx.ai: Plan upgrade to version 2.1.0 or later
- For watsonx.ai on Cloud Pak for Data: Plan upgrade to version 5.1.0 or later
- Review IBM documentation for upgrade prerequisites and procedures
- Back up all critical data and configurations before proceeding
- Execute the upgrade following IBM's documented upgrade path
- Verify the upgrade was successful by logging into the Web UI
- Confirm the XSS vulnerability is no longer present in the fixed version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-49785 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-49785 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data