Linux KernelOperating system · Linux
CVE-2024-49935
A fix is available.
Upgrade to 5.15.168 / 6.1.113 or later.
See remediation →
57/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click
Patch available
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ACPI: PAD: fix crash in exit_round_robin() The kernel occasionally crashes in cpumask_clear_cpu(), which is called within exit_round_robin(), because when executing clear_bit(nr, addr) with nr set to 0xffffffff, the address calculation may cause misalignment within the memory, leading to access to an invalid memory address. ---------- BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffffffe0740618 ... CPU: 3 PID: 2919323 Comm: acpi_pad/14 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G OE X --------- - - 4.18.0-425.19.2.el8_7.x86_64 #1 ... RIP: 0010:power_saving_thread+0x313/0x411 [acpi_pad] Code: 89 cd 48 89 d3 eb d1 48 c7 c7 55 70 72 c0 e8 64 86 b0 e4 c6 05 0d a1 02 00 01 e9 bc fd ff ff 45 89 e4 42 8b 04 a5 20 82 72 c0 <f0> 48 0f b3 05 f4 9c 01 00 42 c7 04 a5 20 82 72 c0 ff ff ff ff 31 RSP: 0018:ff72a5d51fa77ec8 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: 00000000ffffffff RBX: ff462981e5d8cb80 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000246 RDI: 0000000000000246 RBP: ff46297556959d80 R08: 0000000000000382 R09: ff46297c8d0f38d8 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 000000000000000e R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffffffffffffffff R15: 000000000000000e FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ff46297a800c0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: ffffffffe0740618 CR3: 0000007e20410004 CR4: 0000000000771ee0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: ? acpi_pad_add+0x120/0x120 [acpi_pad] kthread+0x10b/0x130 ? set_kthread_struct+0x50/0x50 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40 ... CR2: ffffffffe0740618 crash> dis -lr ffffffffc0726923 ... /usr/src/debug/kernel-4.18.0-425.19.2.el8_7/linux-4.18.0-425.19.2.el8_7.x86_64/./include/linux/cpumask.h: 114 0xffffffffc0726918 <power_saving_thread+776>: mov %r12d,%r12d /usr/src/debug/kernel-4.18.0-425.19.2.el8_7/linux-4.18.0-425.19.2.el8_7.x86_64/./include/linux/cpumask.h: 325 0xffffffffc072691b <power_saving_thread+779>: mov -0x3f8d7de0(,%r12,4),%eax /usr/src/debug/kernel-4.18.0-425.19.2.el8_7/linux-4.18.0-425.19.2.el8_7.x86_64/./arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h: 80 0xffffffffc0726923 <power_saving_thread+787>: lock btr %rax,0x19cf4(%rip) # 0xffffffffc0740620 <pad_busy_cpus_bits> crash> px tsk_in_cpu[14] $66 = 0xffffffff crash> px 0xffffffffc072692c+0x19cf4 $99 = 0xffffffffc0740620 crash> sym 0xffffffffc0740620 ffffffffc0740620 (b) pad_busy_cpus_bits [acpi_pad] crash> px pad_busy_cpus_bits[0] $42 = 0xfffc0 ---------- To fix this, ensure that tsk_in_cpu[tsk_index] != -1 before calling cpumask_clear_cpu() in exit_round_robin(), just as it is done in round_robin_cpu(). [ rjw: Subject edit, avoid updates to the same value ]
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysisA detailed technical summary for this CVE is being prepared.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data
Linux KernelOperating system
Affected:
< 5.15.168>= 5.16, < 6.1.113>= 6.2, < 6.6.55>= 6.7, < 6.10.14>= 6.11, < 6.11.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available
Upgrade to 5.15.168 / 6.1.113 / 6.6.55 or later
Fixed in
5.15.1686.1.1136.6.55
Vendor patch
git.kernel.org →
Recommended fix
High confidence
Linux Kernel >= 5.15.168, >= 6.1.113, >= 6.6.55, or >= 6.10.14 (depending on your stable branch)
- Identify the current kernel version using `uname -r`
- Check your distribution's kernel update repository for available stable versions
- Upgrade the kernel to version 5.15.168 or later, or 6.1.113 or later, or 6.6.55 or later, or 6.10.14 or later (whichever is available for your distribution)
- Reboot the system to load the patched kernel
- Verify the fix is applied by checking `uname -r` matches a fixed version and confirming the ACPI PAD driver loads without crash
Caveat Kernel upgrades may require rebuild of out-of-tree modules and may introduce compatibility changes with older drivers or firmware
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
We can perform the upgrade in your staging environment and verify nothing breaks — typical engagement from $1,600.
Get the upgrade done
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner
Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-49935 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-49935 in production — separate from our analysis above.
Know something about CVE-2024-49935?
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
What this is
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
What belongs here
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data