CVE-2024-51557
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThis vulnerability exists in the Wave 2.0 due to missing rate limiting on OTP requests in an API endpoint. An authenticated remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending multiple OTP request through vulnerable API endpoint which could lead to the OTP bombing/flooding on the targeted system.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis vulnerability exists in Wave 2.0 due to missing rate limiting on OTP requests in an API endpoint. An authenticated remote attacker can exploit this by sending multiple OTP requests through the vulnerable API, leading to OTP bombing/flooding on the targeted system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 120820241550< 1.1.7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed product and versionLocate the 63moons Aero or Wave 2.0 installation and determine its version number. For Aero, check build version 120820241550 or later. For Wave 2.0, check version 1.1.7 or later.Affected if The installed version is below 120820241550 for Aero or below 1.1.7 for Wave 2.0
-
Locate OTP API endpointIdentify the API endpoint that handles OTP (One-Time Password) requests in the Wave 2.0 application. Common patterns include endpoints under /api/otp, /api/auth/otp, or similar authentication-related paths.Affected if The OTP request API endpoint exists and is accessible without additional verification barriers
-
Check if OTP endpoint accepts requestsSend a test OTP request to the identified API endpoint using an authenticated session to verify the endpoint is functional and processing requests.Affected if The endpoint accepts OTP requests and processes them without requiring additional verification like CAPTCHA or proof-of-work
-
Verify rate limiting configurationInspect the web server or application configuration for rate limiting rules on OTP endpoints. Check for any throttling, request limits, or IP-based restrictions applied to the OTP API path.Affected if No rate limiting, request throttling, or IP-based restrictions are configured on the OTP endpoint
You are affected if you are running 63moons Aero before build 120820241550 or Wave 2.0 before version 1.1.7, and the OTP API endpoint is accessible and processes requests without rate limiting in place.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.1.7120820241550
Implement rate limiting on the OTP request API endpoint to restrict the number of OTP requests per user/IP within a defined time window, and consider adding CAPTCHA or account lockout mechanisms after failed attempts.
Aero: 120820241550 | Wave 2.0: 1.1.7
- 1. Identify the affected product (Aero or Wave 2.0) currently deployed in your environment.
- 2. Determine the current version of the installed product.
- 3. For Aero users: Upgrade to version 120820241550 or later.
- 4. For Wave 2.0 users: Upgrade to version 1.1.7 or later.
- 5. After upgrading, verify that the rate limiting is now enforced on OTP request API endpoints.
- 6. Test the OTP functionality to ensure legitimate OTP requests still work correctly after the upgrade.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-51557 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-51557 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data