CVE-2024-51561
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThis vulnerability exists in Aero due to improper implementation of OTP validation mechanism in certain API endpoints. An authenticated remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by intercepting and manipulating the responses exchanged during the second factor authentication process. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow the attacker to bypass OTP verification for accessing other user accounts.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is an OTP (One-Time Password) bypass vulnerability in the Aero product's authentication system. An authenticated attacker can intercept and manipulate HTTP responses during the second-factor authentication (2FA) process to bypass OTP validation, allowing unauthorized access to other user accounts.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 120820241550< 1.1.7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Aero product versionCheck the installed version of 63moons Aero by reviewing the application binaries, About page, or version file. Compare against the threshold 120820241550.Affected if The installed version is lower than 120820241550
-
Identify installed Wave 2.0 versionCheck the installed version of 63moons Wave 2.0 by reviewing the application binaries, About page, or version file. Compare against the threshold 1.1.7.Affected if The installed version is lower than 1.1.7 and the product is Wave 2.0
-
Verify if Two-Factor Authentication is enabledCheck the authentication settings or user configuration in the product admin panel to determine if OTP/2FA is currently active for user logins.Affected if 2FA/OTP authentication is enabled and the version is within the affected ranges
A user is affected if they are running Aero below version 120820241550 or Wave 2.0 below version 1.1.7, and have Two-Factor Authentication enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.1.7120820241550
Fix the OTP validation mechanism to perform proper server-side validation without trusting client-side responses; implement cryptographic verification of OTP tokens and reject any authentication attempt where the OTP validation fails.
Aero: 120820241550 or later | Wave 2.0: 1.1.7 or later
- 1. Identify the currently deployed version of Aero or Wave 2.0 in your environment
- 2. For Aero users: Upgrade to version 120820241550 or later
- 3. For Wave 2.0 users: Upgrade to version 1.1.7 or later
- 4. After upgrading, verify the OTP validation mechanism is functioning correctly by testing second-factor authentication
- 5. Confirm the upgrade was successful by checking the product version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-51561 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-51561 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data