CVE-2024-51739
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCombodo iTop is a simple, web based IT Service Management tool. Unauthenticated user can perform users enumeration, which can make it easier to bruteforce a valid account. As a fix the sentence displayed after resetting password no longer shows if the user exists or not. This fix is included in versions 2.7.11, 3.0.5, 3.1.2, and 3.2.0. Users are advised to upgrade. Users unable to upgrade may overload the dictionary entry `"UI:ResetPwd-Error-WrongLogin"` through an extension and replace it with a generic message.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn Combodo iTop versions prior to 2.7.11, 3.0.5, 3.1.2, and 3.2.0, the password reset functionality reveals whether a username exists in the system. An unauthenticated attacker can submit password reset requests and observe the response to determine valid usernames, enabling subsequent brute-force attacks against those accounts.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.7.11>= 3.0.0, < 3.0.5>= 3.1.0, < 3.1.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed iTop versionCheck the version file in your iTop installation directory, typically in a 'version.info' file or by accessing the iTop welcome page which displays the version numberAffected if The installed version is prior to 2.7.11, or is 3.0.0 through 3.0.4, or is 3.1.0 through 3.1.1, or is any version below 3.2.0 from the 3.x branch
-
Locate the password reset endpointAccess the password reset URL path, typically at '/pages/UI.php?loginop=reset_pwd' or similar path under your iTop web rootAffected if The password reset page is accessible without authentication
-
Test password reset response for non-existent userSubmit a password reset request using a clearly invalid username (e.g., 'nonexistentuser12345') and capture the HTTP response or error messageAffected if The response indicates the user does not exist with a specific error message
-
Test password reset response for valid userSubmit a password reset request using a known valid username in your iTop system and capture the responseAffected if The response differs from the invalid user response, confirming the system reveals user existence through different messages
You are affected if your iTop version falls within the vulnerable ranges and the password reset endpoint returns different responses for valid versus invalid usernames, allowing user enumeration.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.7.113.0.53.1.2
Upgrade to iTop version 2.7.11, 3.0.5, 3.1.2, or 3.2.0. Alternatively, overload the dictionary entry 'UI:ResetPwd-Error-WrongLogin' through an extension to display a generic message regardless of user existence.
3.2.0 (or nearest fixed version: 2.7.11, 3.0.5, 3.1.2)
- 1. Back up your iTop database and configuration files before upgrading.
- 2. Download the appropriate fixed version for your current installation branch: 2.7.11, 3.0.5, 3.1.2, or 3.2.0.
- 3. Extract the new version files to your web server document root.
- 4. Copy your existing `config.php` and any custom extension directories to the new installation.
- 5. Run the iTop setup/upgrade process by accessing the setup page in your browser.
- 6. Follow the on-screen prompts to complete the database upgrade.
- 7. Verify the password reset functionality no longer reveals whether a user exists by testing with valid and invalid usernames.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-51739 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-51739 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data