CVE-2024-52943
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in Veritas Enterprise Vault before 15.1 UPD882911, ZDI-CAN-24697. It allows an authenticated remote attacker to inject a parameter into an HTTP request, allowing for Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) while viewing archived content. This could reflect back to an authenticated user without sanitization if executed by that user.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceVeritas Enterprise Vault before version 15.1 UPD882911 contains a reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An authenticated attacker can inject malicious parameters into HTTP requests when viewing archived content, which then reflects back unsanitized to the authenticated user, allowing arbitrary JavaScript execution in the user's browser context.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 15.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine Enterprise Vault versionLocate the installed Enterprise Vault version through the Veritas installed programs list, EVAbout.exe utility, or the Vault Administration Console (VAC) under Server Properties. Compare the version number to 15.1.Affected if The installed version is below 15.1 (for example, 14.x, 14.3, 14.4, etc.) or version 15.0/15.0.x without patch UPD882911.
-
Verify patch UPD882911 is appliedCheck the installed updates or patch level for Enterprise Vault. This can be verified through the VAC under Server Properties > Updates, or by reviewing the installed hotfixes/patches on the server.Affected if Patch UPD882911 is not listed among installed updates, indicating the vulnerability remains unpatched.
-
Confirm web interface is accessibleVerify that the Enterprise Vault web interface (EVDashboard, Outlook Web App integration, or the main EV web portal) is reachable via HTTP/HTTPS. Check IIS site bindings and firewall rules.Affected if The web interface is accessible and the server is network-reachable, providing the attack surface for XSS injection.
-
Check if external or untrusted authentication is possibleReview the authentication configuration for the Enterprise Vault web applications. Determine if the web interface permits login from users outside the trusted internal network.Affected if The web interface allows authentication by users who are not fully trusted, or the EV web portal accepts user-supplied parameters when rendering archived content.
You are affected if Enterprise Vault is installed with a version below 15.1 and patch UPD882911 has not been applied, with the web interface accessible to authenticated users who can view archived content.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped15.1
Apply the vendor patch (15.1 UPD882911) to remediate the XSS vulnerability. As a temporary control, restrict administrative access to the Enterprise Vault web interface and monitor for suspicious parameter injection patterns in HTTP requests.
Enterprise Vault 15.1 with update UPD882911
- 1. Identify the current Enterprise Vault version by checking the version in the Administration Console or running the version check command
- 2. Download Enterprise Vault version 15.1 with update UPD882911 from the Veritas Support website (www.veritas.com)
- 3. Review the Veritas Enterprise Vault Upgrade Guide for version 15.1 to understand prerequisites and compatibility requirements
- 4. Create a complete backup of the Enterprise Vault database and configuration
- 5. Execute the upgrade installer for version 15.1 following the documented upgrade procedures
- 6. After upgrade, verify that the version shows 15.1 with UPD882911 applied
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-52943 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-52943 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data