CVE-2024-52944
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in Veritas Enterprise Vault before 15.1 UPD882911, ZDI-CAN-24698. It allows an authenticated remote attacker to inject a parameter into an HTTP request, allowing for Cross-Site Scripting while viewing archived content. This could reflect back to an authenticated user without sanitization if executed by that user.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceVeritas Enterprise Vault before version 15.1 UPD882911 contains a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability where an authenticated remote attacker can inject a malicious parameter into an HTTP request when uploading or viewing archived content. The injected payload reflects back to the authenticated user without proper sanitization, allowing execution of arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser context.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 15.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Enterprise Vault versionLocate and inspect the Enterprise Vault version information through the product's administration console, registry, or version file. Common locations include the program files directory, help/about section, or enterprise vault manager interface.Affected if The installed version is any release before 15.1, or version 15.1 without patch UPD882911 applied.
-
Confirm Enterprise Vault services are runningVerify that the Enterprise Vault services and web components are active. Check the Windows services panel or command line for Enterprise Vault-related services.Affected if Services are running and the web interface is accessible to authenticated users.
-
Verify archived content functionality is enabledConfirm that the archived content viewing or upload feature is accessible. This typically involves checking the Enterprise Vault web access modules or Outlook integration components.Affected if Users have access to view or upload archived content through the Enterprise Vault client or web portal.
-
Review user authentication configurationCheck that authenticated user access is permitted to the archive viewing interface. Examine the authentication settings in the Enterprise Vault administration console.Affected if Remote authenticated users can access the archived content management features.
You are affected if your installed Enterprise Vault version is before 15.1 (or 15.1 without patch UPD882911), the archived content viewing/upload feature is enabled, and authenticated users can access the web interface.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped15.1
Apply vendor patch UPD882911 to version 15.1, or implement output encoding and input validation on all user-supplied parameters within the archived content viewing functionality to prevent XSS execution.
15.1 UPD882911
- 1. Identify current Enterprise Vault version by checking the installation or consulting Veritas documentation
- 2. Navigate to Veritas Support website (www.veritas.com) or Veritas-download center
- 3. Download Enterprise Vault version 15.1 with update UPD882911 (or the latest available 15.1 release that includes this security fix)
- 4. Review Veritas Enterprise Vault upgrade documentation for your specific deployment topology
- 5. Create a complete backup of the Enterprise Vault database and configuration
- 6. Apply the upgrade in a non-production environment first to validate compatibility
- 7. Execute the upgrade following Veritas standard upgrade procedures
- 8. After upgrade, verify the Enterprise Vault services are running correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-52944 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-52944 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data