CVE-2024-53041
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability has been identified in Teamcenter Visualization V14.2 (All versions < V14.2.0.14), Teamcenter Visualization V14.3 (All versions < V14.3.0.12), Teamcenter Visualization V2312 (All versions < V2312.0008), Tecnomatix Plant Simulation V2302 (All versions < V2302.0016), Tecnomatix Plant Simulation V2404 (All versions < V2404.0005). The affected applications contain a stack based overflow vulnerability while parsing specially crafted WRL files. This could allow an attacker to execute code in the context of the current process. (ZDI-CAN-25000)
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in Teamcenter Visualization and Tecnomatix Plant Simulation allows remote code execution when parsing specially crafted WRL (VRML) files. The flaw exists in the affected applications' WRL file parsing routines, enabling an attacker to overwrite stack memory and execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 14.2, < 14.2.0.14>= 14.3, < 14.3.0.12>= 2312.0, < 2312.0008>= 2302.0, < 2302.0016>= 2404.0, < 2404.0005CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Teamcenter Visualization installed versionLocate the Teamcenter Visualization installation and retrieve its version number (typically via the application binary, installation directory, or system registry under the Siemens software entries)Affected if The version is 14.2.x before 14.2.0.14, OR 14.3.x before 14.3.0.12, OR 2312.0.x before 2312.0008
-
Check Tecnomatix Plant Simulation installed versionLocate the Tecnomatix Plant Simulation installation and retrieve its version number (typically via the application binary, installation directory, or system registry under the Siemens software entries)Affected if The version is 2302.0.x before 2302.0016, OR 2404.0.x before 2404.0005
-
Identify if WRL file parsing feature is in useReview application usage or configuration to determine if the WRL (VRML) file import or parsing functionality is accessible or enabled for users or automated processesAffected if WRL file parsing capability is available and the software version falls within the affected ranges listed above
You are affected if either Teamcenter Visualization or Tecnomatix Plant Simulation is installed with a version matching the affected ranges AND the WRL parsing feature can be invoked to process specially crafted WRL files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped14.2.0.1414.3.0.122302.0016
Apply vendor-provided patches to reach the fixed versions (Teamcenter Visualization V14.2.0.14, V14.3.0.12, V2312.0008; Tecnomatix Plant Simulation V2302.0016, V2404.0005) and implement input validation controls for untrusted WRL files.
Teamcenter Visualization: 14.2.0.14, 14.3.0.12, or 2312.0008 | Tecnomatix Plant Simulation: 2302.0016 or 2404.0005
- 1. Identify the exact version of Teamcenter Visualization or Tecnomatix Plant Simulation currently installed
- 2. For Teamcenter Visualization: Determine which major version branch you are on (14.2, 14.3, or 2312)
- 3. For Tecnomatix Plant Simulation: Determine which major version branch you are on (2302 or 2404)
- 4. Download the appropriate fixed version from Siemens official support channels (cert-portal.siemens.com)
- 5. For Teamcenter Visualization: Upgrade to V14.2.0.14 (if on 14.2.x), V14.3.0.12 (if on 14.3.x), or V2312.0008 (if on 2312.x)
- 6. For Tecnomatix Plant Simulation: Upgrade to V2302.0016 (if on 2302.x) or V2404.0005 (if on 2404.x)
- 7. Verify the vulnerability is remediated by confirming the installed version matches the fixed release
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-53041 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-53041 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data