CVE-2024-53298
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDell PowerScale OneFS, versions 9.5.0.0 through 9.10.0.1, contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the NFS export. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability leading to unauthorized filesystem access. The attacker may be able to read, modify, and delete arbitrary files. This vulnerability is considered critical as it can be leveraged to fully compromise the system. Dell recommends customers to upgrade at the earliest opportunity.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA missing authorization vulnerability exists in the NFS export functionality of Dell PowerScale OneFS versions 9.5.0.0 through 9.10.0.1. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this flaw to gain unrestricted filesystem access, enabling read, modification, and deletion of arbitrary files on the storage system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 9.5.0.0, <= 9.10.0.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed PowerScale OneFS versionRun 'isi version' or check the system information through the OneFS web administration interface under Cluster > OverviewAffected if The reported version falls within 9.5.0.0 through 9.10.0.1 (inclusive)
-
Verify if NFS export functionality is enabledRun 'isi services -a' or check through the web interface under Protocol Configuration > NFS to confirm the NFS service is runningAffected if NFS service is currently running or enabled on the system
-
List active NFS exports and their access controlsRun 'isi nfs exports list' or navigate to Protocol Configuration > NFS > Exports in the web interface to view all exported paths and their client access rulesAffected if Any NFS export exists without proper IP-based access restrictions or with '0.0.0.0/0' allowed access
-
Inspect NFS export configuration for authorization rulesReview each NFS export's client access list using 'isi nfs exports view <export_id>' or the web interface to verify whether specific trusted IPs are definedAffected if Exports permit unrestricted access from any IP address (0.0.0.0/0 or anonymous mapping) rather than limiting access to known trusted IP addresses
The environment is affected if the OneFS version is between 9.5.0.0 and 9.10.0.1 and NFS exports are configured, regardless of access control settings, since the vulnerability allows unauthenticated attackers to bypass NFS authorization entirely.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedDell recommends upgrading to a version beyond 9.10.0.1 at the earliest opportunity. As an interim measure, implement network-level access controls restricting NFS access to trusted IP addresses only.
Dell PowerScale OneFS version > 9.10.0.1 (contact Dell for specific fixed release)
- Contact Dell PowerScale support or visit dell.com/support to obtain the latest OneFS version that addresses CVE-2024-53298
- Review the Dell PowerScale OneFS upgrade documentation and release notes for the target version
- Schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade procedure
- Back up critical data and configuration before proceeding with the upgrade
- Follow the standard OneFS upgrade process using the ISI upgrade command or the OneFS web UI
- Verify the upgrade completed successfully and the NFS export authorization controls are functioning properly
- Validate that the vulnerability is resolved by confirming NFS export access controls now require proper authentication
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation10.0 h
- Implementation20.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $13,568.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-53298 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-53298 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data