CVE-2026-22278
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDell PowerScale OneFS versions prior to 9.13.0.0 contains an improper restriction of excessive authentication attempts vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Unauthorized access.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceDell PowerScale OneFS versions prior to 9.13.0.0 fail to properly restrict excessive authentication attempts, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to perform unlimited login attempts (brute force/password spray) without account lockout or rate limiting, potentially leading to unauthorized access to the system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 9.13.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed PowerScale OneFS versionRun the OneFS CLI command to display the current firmware version (commonly 'isi version' or check through the web administration interface under System > Overview)Affected if The displayed version is any release prior to 9.13.0.0 (for example 9.12.x, 9.11.x, earlier releases)
-
Verify account lockout policy configurationAccess the OneFS authentication settings through the web UI (Platform API or isi command line) and examine the account lockout parameters that control how many failed attempts trigger a lockoutAffected if No account lockout policy is defined, or the lockout threshold is set to zero (unlimited attempts allowed) or is missing entirely
-
Confirm authentication rate limiting is enabledReview the authentication rate limiting or throttling configuration in OneFS settings (typically found under Security > Authentication or via the isi auth settings CLI)Affected if Rate limiting is disabled, not configured, or set to allow unlimited authentication attempts per time window
-
Inspect authentication logs for brute force activityExamine OneFS audit or authentication logs (via 'isi audit' or the logs directory) for evidence of repeated failed login attempts from the same source without triggering any blocksAffected if Logs show many failed authentication attempts from a single source without any account lockout or rate limit intervention occurring
Your environment is affected if the installed OneFS version is below 9.13.0.0 AND no account lockout or rate limiting controls are actively enforced in the authentication configuration.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped9.13.0.0
Upgrade Dell PowerScale OneFS to version 9.13.0.0 or later to obtain the patch that implements proper authentication attempt restrictions.
OneFS 9.13.0.0
- Back up the current OneFS configuration and critical data before proceeding with the upgrade
- Download the OneFS 9.13.0.0 update package from Dell Technologies support website
- Access the PowerScale OneFS web administration interface or use the CLI (isi升级) to initiate the upgrade
- Follow the on-screen prompts or use the 'isi升级 -a' command to apply the OneFS 9.13.0.0 update
- Allow the system to complete the upgrade process and automatically reboot as needed
- After the system restarts, verify the OneFS version is 9.13.0.0 or later using 'isi version' or the web UI
- Confirm the authentication mechanism is functioning correctly and the vulnerability is remediated
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-22278 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-22278 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data