SupersetApplication · Apache

CVE-2024-55633

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-12-12
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 4.1.0 or later.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Improper Authorization vulnerability in Apache Superset. On Postgres analytic databases an attacker with SQLLab access can craft a specially designed SQL DML statement that is Incorrectly identified as a read-only query, enabling its execution. Non postgres analytics database connections and postgres analytics database connections set with a readonly user (advised) are not vulnerable.  This issue affects Apache Superset: before 4.1.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.1.0, which fixes the issue.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Apache Superset before 4.1.0 contains an improper authorization flaw where SQLLab incorrectly identifies certain Postgres DML statements as read-only queries. An attacker with SQLLab access can craft specially designed INSERT, UPDATE, or DELETE statements that bypass the read-only check, allowing unauthorized data modification on Postgres analytic database connections.

MitigationUpgrade Apache Superset to version 4.1.0 or later, or ensure Postgres analytic database connections use a readonly database user to prevent exploitation.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
SupersetApplication
Affected:< 4.1.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check Apache Superset version
    Run 'pip show apache-superset' or check the version in your package manager to determine if the installed version is before 4.1.0
    Affected if Installed version is less than 4.1.0
  2. Verify SQLLab is enabled
    Check Superset configuration file (superset_config.py) for ENABLE_SQLLAB = True, or inspect the Superset UI to confirm SQLLab feature is accessible to users
    Affected if SQLLab is enabled and accessible to the user in question
  3. Identify Postgres analytic database connections
    In Superset UI, navigate to Data > Databases, or query the 'dbs' table in the metadata database to list all configured database connections
    Affected if Any database connection uses Postgres as the engine type (postgresql)
  4. Check database user privileges on Postgres connections
    Review the connection configuration for each Postgres database to determine if the database user is configured as read-only or has only SELECT privileges
    Affected if The Postgres connection uses a database user with write privileges (INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE) rather than a read-only user

You are affected if running Apache Superset version below 4.1.0, SQLLab is enabled, and you have Postgres database connections that do not use a read-only database user.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 4.1.0 or later
Fixed in 4.1.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Apache Superset to version 4.1.0 or later, or ensure Postgres analytic database connections use a readonly database user to prevent exploitation.

Recommended fix High confidence

4.1.0

  1. Upgrade Apache Superset to version 4.1.0 or later as recommended in the official security advisory
  2. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the Superset version
  3. For additional defense-in-depth with Postgres analytic databases, configure the connection to use a readonly database user as advised in the advisory

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Superset Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
7.0 hours of engineering $1,240
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-55633 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-55633 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data