dbcve.org
Linux KernelOperating system · Linux

CVE-2024-57903

MEDIUM · 5.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-01-15
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 4.10 / 4.15 or later.
See remediation →
57/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click Patch available

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: restrict SO_REUSEPORT to inet sockets After blamed commit, crypto sockets could accidentally be destroyed from RCU call back, as spotted by zyzbot [1]. Trying to acquire a mutex in RCU callback is not allowed. Restrict SO_REUSEPORT socket option to inet sockets. v1 of this patch supported TCP, UDP and SCTP sockets, but fcnal-test.sh test needed RAW and ICMP support. [1] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:562 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 24, name: ksoftirqd/1 preempt_count: 100, expected: 0 RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0 1 lock held by ksoftirqd/1/24: #0: ffffffff8e937ba0 (rcu_callback){....}-{0:0}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:337 [inline] #0: ffffffff8e937ba0 (rcu_callback){....}-{0:0}, at: rcu_do_batch kernel/rcu/tree.c:2561 [inline] #0: ffffffff8e937ba0 (rcu_callback){....}-{0:0}, at: rcu_core+0xa37/0x17a0 kernel/rcu/tree.c:2823 Preemption disabled at: [<ffffffff8161c8c8>] softirq_handle_begin kernel/softirq.c:402 [inline] [<ffffffff8161c8c8>] handle_softirqs+0x128/0x9b0 kernel/softirq.c:537 CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 24 Comm: ksoftirqd/1 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc3-syzkaller-00174-ga024e377efed #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/13/2024 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120 __might_resched+0x5d4/0x780 kernel/sched/core.c:8758 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:562 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x131/0xee0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:735 crypto_put_default_null_skcipher+0x18/0x70 crypto/crypto_null.c:179 aead_release+0x3d/0x50 crypto/algif_aead.c:489 alg_do_release crypto/af_alg.c:118 [inline] alg_sock_destruct+0x86/0xc0 crypto/af_alg.c:502 __sk_destruct+0x58/0x5f0 net/core/sock.c:2260 rcu_do_batch kernel/rcu/tree.c:2567 [inline] rcu_core+0xaaa/0x17a0 kernel/rcu/tree.c:2823 handle_softirqs+0x2d4/0x9b0 kernel/softirq.c:561 run_ksoftirqd+0xca/0x130 kernel/softirq.c:950 smpboot_thread_fn+0x544/0xa30 kernel/smpboot.c:164 kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389 ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244 </TASK>

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis
How this class of weakness works · CWE-667

Shared resources are accessed without correct locking, so concurrent operations interleave into inconsistent — and sometimes exploitable — states, or deadlock the service outright. These bugs are subtle and timing-dependent. The fix is correct, consistent locking or atomic operations around every shared resource.

General guidance for the improper locking class — the official description and references above are authoritative for this specific CVE. Want a bespoke review and a reviewed fix? Ask our team →

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Linux KernelOperating system
Affected:>= 4.9.196, < 4.10>= 4.14.148, < 4.15>= 4.19.78, < 4.20>= 5.2.20, < 5.3>= 5.3.5, < 5.4>= 5.4.1, < 5.15.176>= 5.16, < 6.1.124>= 6.2, < 6.6.70>= 6.7, < 6.12.9= 5.4= 6.13

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 4.10 / 4.15 / 4.20 or later
Fixed in 4.104.154.20
Vendor patch git.kernel.org →
Recommended fix High confidence

Upgrade to kernel 4.10 or later (for 4.9.x branch), 4.15 or later (for 4.14.x branch), 4.20 or later (for 4.19.x branch), or 5.3 or later (for 5.2.x branch)

  1. 1. Identify the current running kernel version using `uname -r`
  2. 2. Determine which version branch your kernel is on (4.9.x, 4.14.x, 4.19.x, or 5.2.x)
  3. 3. Upgrade to the next stable release in your branch: for 4.9.x upgrade to 4.10.x or later, for 4.14.x upgrade to 4.15.x or later, for 4.19.x upgrade to 4.20.x or later, for 5.2.x upgrade to 5.3.x or later
  4. 4. If using a distribution kernel (e.g., Debian, Ubuntu), upgrade to a distribution kernel version that includes the fix
  5. 5. Reboot into the upgraded kernel
  6. 6. Verify the fix is applied by checking that SO_REUSEPORT is now restricted to inet sockets and that the mutex lock bug in RCU callbacks no longer occurs
Caveat These are major version jumps within stable branches; ensure application compatibility with newer kernel APIs as these are older kernel branches

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

We can perform the upgrade in your staging environment and verify nothing breaks — typical engagement from $1,600. Get the upgrade done

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-57903 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

Get it on GitHub Scan in the browser

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-57903 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data