CVE-2024-58317
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA cookie security configuration vulnerability in Kentico Xperience allows attackers to bypass SSL requirements when setting administration cookies via web.config. The vulnerability affects .NET Framework projects by incorrectly handling the 'requireSSL' attribute, potentially compromising session security and authentication state.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceKentico Xperience for .NET Framework contains a cookie security misconfiguration where the requireSSL attribute in web.config is incorrectly handled for administration cookies. This allows cookies to be set without the secure flag, potentially allowing session theft or authentication bypass via interception of unencrypted cookie transmission.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 13.0.164CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Kentico Xperience versionLocate the Kentico Xperience version by checking the assembly version of CMS.dll in the bin folder, or log into the administration interface and navigate to the 'About' or 'Help' section where version information is displayedAffected if Version is 13.0.164 or lower
-
Locate the web.config fileFind the web.config file in the root directory of the Kentico Xperience application (typically in the CMS folder or site root)Affected if web.config exists and is readable
-
Inspect requireSSL attribute configurationOpen web.config and search for 'requireSSL' within the <system.web> and <httpModules> or <system.webServer> sections, particularly looking for cookie settings under FormsAuthentication or Session configurationsAffected if requireSSL is set to 'false' or is missing for authentication/session cookies, or administration cookie configurations omit the secure flag
-
Verify cookie configuration for admin areaSearch web.config for sections related to admin authentication cookies - look for FormsAuthentication element, cookie settings, and any 'CookieDomain' or 'CookiePath' configurationsAffected if Administration cookies do not have requireSSL='true' explicitly set, or configuration allows non-HTTPS cookie transmission for admin areas
-
Test live cookie attributes (optional)If the application is accessible, use browser developer tools (F12) to inspect cookies set during admin login - check the 'Secure' flag on cookies with names like '.ASPXAUTH', 'CMSPreferredCulture', or other session-related cookiesAffected if Admin cookies are set without the Secure flag when accessing the admin interface over HTTPS
If Kentico Xperience version is 13.0.164 or lower AND web.config lacks requireSSL='true' for administration cookies, the environment is affected by this vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedReview and correctly configure the requireSSL attribute for all cookies in web.config, ensuring administration cookies are set with requireSSL='true' to enforce Secure flag and HTTPS-only transmission.
Xperience 13.0.165 or later (latest 13.0.x hotfix)
- Obtain the latest Kentico Xperience 13.0.x hotfix from the Kentico DevNet portal (devnet.kentico.com) or official Kentico distribution channels
- Backup your current project files and database before applying any updates
- Apply the hotfix to your Xperience installation, ensuring all assemblies and configuration files are updated
- Verify the web.config settings for cookie security: ensure forms authentication and session state cookies have requireSSL="true" set appropriately
- Test the application thoroughly in a staging environment, specifically verifying that administration cookies are only sent over HTTPS
- Deploy the fixed version to production
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,304.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-58317 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-58317 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data