CVE-2024-58318
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in Kentico Xperience allows attackers to inject malicious scripts via the rich text editor component for page and form builders. Attackers can exploit this vulnerability by entering malicious URIs, potentially allowing malicious scripts to execute in users' browsers.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in Kentico Xperience's rich text editor component used for page and form builders. Attackers can inject malicious scripts through specially crafted URIs that get stored in the CMS. When users view content containing these malicious URIs, the embedded scripts execute in their browsers, potentially allowing session hijacking, credential theft, or unauthorized actions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 13.0.162CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed Kentico Xperience versionAccess the Kentico administration dashboard and navigate to the About section, or check the version.dll or assembly information in the deployment directory. Alternatively, query the CMS database version table if accessible.Affected if The installed version number is 13.0.162 or lower.
-
Confirm the rich text editor component is in useReview the Kentico Xperience configuration for page types and form definitions. Check whether any page templates or form builder configurations include the Rich text editor (also called CKEditor in Kentico) input type.Affected if Rich text editor fields are defined in active page types or form builder forms within the CMS.
-
Inspect rich text editor URI validation settingsAccess the Settings application in Kentico administration. Navigate to the Content -> Rich text editor settings section. Examine any configuration options related to URL protocols, link validation, or input filtering for the editor.Affected if URI validation is disabled, set to allow all protocols, or no strict filtering is configured for links inserted in the rich text editor.
-
Review recent content entries in the CMSUse the Pages application to view recently created or modified page content. Check form builder submissions if available. Look for any entries containing unusual URI patterns, especially those with javascript: or data: prefixes, or URIs with encoded characters in link or anchor fields.Affected if Content exists in the CMS with suspicious URIs in rich text fields that may contain encoded XSS payloads.
You are affected if your Kentico Xperience installation is version 13.0.162 or lower and you have the rich text editor component enabled with active content that could contain malicious URIs.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedImplement strict input validation and output encoding for all URIs entered in the rich text editor, apply Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to mitigate XSS execution, and apply any vendor-supplied patches for Kentico Xperience.
Kentico Xperience 13.0.163 or later (latest 13.0.x hotfix)
- 1. Navigate to the Kentico Xperience administration interface
- 2. Check the current version number in System > Application (or Help > About)
- 3. Obtain the latest Kentico Xperience 13.0.x hotfix from the Kentico Devnet portal or official download channels
- 4. Backup the Xperience database and website files before applying updates
- 5. Install the hotfix following Kentico's standard upgrade procedures
- 6. Verify the rich text editor now properly sanitizes malicious URIs
- 7. Test the patch by attempting to insert script-containing URIs in the rich text editor for page and form builders
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-58318 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-58318 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data