CVE-2024-6360
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIncorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource vulnerability in OpenText™ Vertica could allow Privilege Abuse and result in unauthorized access or privileges to Vertica agent apikey. This issue affects Vertica: from 10.0 through 10.X, from 11.0 through 11.X, from 12.0 through 12.X, from 23.0 through 23.X, from 24.0 through 24.X.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is an Incorrect Permission Assignment vulnerability in OpenText Vertica where the Vertica agent API key has improperly configured permissions. This allows privilege abuse where an attacker with limited access could potentially read or access the API key due to overly permissive settings, escalating their privileges within the Vertica system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 10.0.0-0, < 12.0.4-30>= 23.0.0-0, < 23.3.0-11>= 23.4.0-0, < 23.4.0-13>= 24.1.0-0, < 24.1.0-8>= 24.2.0-0, < 24.2.0-4= 24.3.0-0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Vertica versionRun 'SELECT VERSION();' against the Vertica database or check the installed package version using the system package manager (e.g., 'rpm -q vertica' or 'dpkg -l | grep vertica')Affected if The installed version falls within the affected ranges: Microfocus Vertica 10.0.0-0 to 12.0.4-29, 23.0.0-0 to 23.3.0-10, or 23.4.0-0 to 23.4.0-12; OpenText Vertica 24.1.0-0 to 24.1.0-7, 24.2.0-0 to 24.2.0-3, or 24.3.0-0
-
Determine if Vertica agent is in useCheck for the presence of the Vertica agent process or service (e.g., look for 'vertica_agent' in running processes via 'ps aux | grep -i vertica' or check for agent-related configuration files in the Vertica installation directory)Affected if The Vertica agent is installed and running - the vulnerability only applies when the agent is enabled
-
Locate the Vertica agent API key fileSearch for the agent configuration directory, typically found under the Vertica installation path (e.g., look in /opt/vertica/agent or similar configuration directories, and search for files named 'api_key', 'key', or containing 'APIKEY' or similar patterns)Affected if The API key file exists on the system - if the agent is in use, there should be an associated key file
-
Check file system permissions on the API key fileUse 'ls -la <path_to_api_key_file>' to list permissions, and verify using 'getfacl <path_to_api_key_file>' if available. Check if the file is readable by non-privileged users (permissions should not include 'r' for 'other' or group)Affected if Permissions allow read access by non-owner users (e.g., mode shows 'r--r--r--' or similar broader permissions, or ownership is set to a shared group that includes untrusted users)
-
Verify ownership and access control on the API key fileReview the file ownership (should be owned by the Vertica database administrator account or a dedicated service account) and check for any overly permissive Access Control Lists (ACLs) that grant access to unprivileged users or groupsAffected if The file is owned by a shared or privileged group, or ACLs grant access to users beyond the intended Vertica administrators
You are affected if your Vertica version is within the affected ranges, the Vertica agent is enabled, and the API key file is readable by non-privileged users due to overly permissive file permissions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped12.0.4-3023.3.0-1123.4.0-13
Apply proper file system and configuration permissions to restrict access to the Vertica agent API key, ensuring only authorized Vertica components and administrators can read it. Consult Vertica documentation or patches for version-specific permission guidance.
Upgrade to the minimum fixed version for your branch: 12.0.4-30, 23.3.0-11, 23.4.0-13, 24.1.0-8, 24.2.0-4, or 24.3.0-1 (or later)
- 1. Identify the currently installed Vertica version using 'SELECT version();' or checking the installation directory
- 2. Determine which version range your current installation falls into (10.0.0-0 to 12.x, 23.0.x to 23.3.x, 23.4.x, 24.1.x, 24.2.x, or 24.3.0-0)
- 3. For version 10.x/11.x: Upgrade to Vertica 12.0.4-30 or later
- 4. For version 23.0.x to 23.3.x: Upgrade to Vertica 23.3.0-11 or later
- 5. For version 23.4.x: Upgrade to Vertica 23.4.0-13 or later
- 6. For version 24.1.x: Upgrade to Vertica 24.1.0-8 or later
- 7. For version 24.2.x: Upgrade to Vertica 24.2.0-4 or later
- 8. For version 24.3.0-0: Upgrade to Vertica 24.3.0-1 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,152.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-6360 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-6360 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data