Panda DomeApplication · Pandasecurity

CVE-2024-7244

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-11-22
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
80/100
Remediation priority · High
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Panda Security Dome VPN DLL Hijacking Local Privilege Escalation Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows local attackers to escalate privileges on affected installations of Panda Security Dome. An attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the VPN process. The process does not restrict DLL search to trusted paths, which can result in the loading of a malicious DLL. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to escalate privileges and execute arbitrary code in the context of SYSTEM. Was ZDI-CAN-23428.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A DLL hijacking vulnerability exists in Panda Security Dome VPN where the VPN process does not restrict DLL search paths to trusted locations. This allows a local attacker who already has low-privileged code execution to place a malicious DLL in a search path location, causing the VPN process to load it and execute with SYSTEM privileges.

MitigationApply the vendor-supplied patch for Panda Security Dome VPN when available. As a compensating control, ensure low-privilege users cannot write to directories in the VPN application's DLL search path, and consider implementing DLL search order hardening via group policy.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Panda DomeApplication
Affected:= 22.02.01

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify Panda Dome VPN is installed
    Check for the presence of Panda Security Panda Dome VPN in the system - look for the application in Add/Remove Programs, Program Files, or check for the Panda Dome VPN service
    Affected if The application is not installed on the system
  2. Check installed Panda Dome version
    Open the application or check its About/Help section to find the exact version number. Compare against the affected version 22.02.01
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 22.02.01 (exact match per the affected range)
  3. Verify VPN service runs with elevated privileges
    Open Services, locate the Panda Dome VPN service, check the Log On As account - if it runs as SYSTEM or another privileged account, the DLL could be loaded with those elevated privileges
    Affected if The VPN service runs as SYSTEM or a privileged account (not a low-privilege service account)
  4. Check write permissions in application directory
    Examine file system permissions on the Panda Dome installation directory. Use icacls or file explorer security tab to check which users can create or write files in that directory and subdirectories
    Affected if Low-privilege users or the current user has write access to directories in the application's search path

If Panda Dome VPN version 22.02.01 is installed and runs with SYSTEM/elevated privileges while allowing low-privilege users to write to directories in its DLL search path, the environment is vulnerable to DLL hijacking.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the vendor-supplied patch for Panda Security Dome VPN when available. As a compensating control, ensure low-privilege users cannot write to directories in the VPN application's DLL search path, and consider implementing DLL search order hardening via group policy.

Fix this in Panda Dome Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
6.0 hours of engineering $1,060
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-7244 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-7244 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data