Panda DomeApplication · Pandasecurity

CVE-2024-7245

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-11-22
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
80/100
Remediation priority · High
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Panda Security Dome VPN Incorrect Permission Assignment Local Privilege Escalation Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows local attackers to escalate privileges on affected installations of Panda Security Dome. An attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the Hydra Sdk Windows Service. The issue lies in the lack of proper permissions set on a folder created by the service. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to escalate privileges and execute arbitrary code in the context of SYSTEM. Was ZDI-CAN-23429.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Hydra Sdk Windows Service in Panda Security Dome VPN creates a folder with incorrect permissions (likely overly permissive Access Control Lists). A local attacker with the ability to execute low-privileged code can write executable files to this folder or manipulate its contents, then leverage the service's SYSTEM-level privileges to execute those files and gain full system control.

MitigationApply the vendor patch when released. As an interim control, audit and restrict permissions on folders created by the Hydra Sdk service to follow least-privilege principles, removing write access for non-admin users.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Panda DomeApplication
Affected:= 22.02.01

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Panda Dome version
    Check the Windows registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\PandaDome or use 'Get-ItemProperty' on the installation directory to find the version
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 22.02.01
  2. Locate the Hydra Sdk Windows Service
    Open Services console (services.msc) or run 'Get-Service | Where-Object {$_.DisplayName -like "*Hydra*"}' to find services containing Hydra in the name
    Affected if A service named Hydra Sdk or similar is present and running
  3. Identify the folder created by the Hydra Sdk service
    Use Process Monitor (procmon) from Sysinternals to monitor file system activity from the Hydra Sdk service process, or inspect the service's installation directory under C:\Program Files\Panda Security\Panda Dome\
    Affected if The service creates a subfolder under its installation directory with permissive access rights
  4. Examine folder permissions for excessive access
    Right-click the identified folder, go to Properties > Security tab, or run 'Get-Acl "<folder path>" | fl' to view the Access Control List
    Affected if Users without administrator privileges are granted Write or Modify permissions to the folder, allowing them to create or modify executable files there

A user is affected if Panda Dome version 22.02.01 is installed and the Hydra Sdk service creates a folder where non-admin users have Write or Modify permissions that could be exploited for privilege escalation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the vendor patch when released. As an interim control, audit and restrict permissions on folders created by the Hydra Sdk service to follow least-privilege principles, removing write access for non-admin users.

Fix this in Panda Dome Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-7245 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-7245 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data