FirewallApplication · Comodo

CVE-2024-7249

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-07-29
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
80/100
Remediation priority · High
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Comodo Firewall Link Following Local Privilege Escalation Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows local attackers to escalate privileges on affected installations of Comodo Firewall. An attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the cmdagent executable. By creating a symbolic link, an attacker can abuse the application to delete a file. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to escalate privileges and execute arbitrary code in the context of SYSTEM. Was ZDI-CAN-21794.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

This is a link following local privilege escalation vulnerability in Comodo Firewall's cmdagent.exe. An attacker with existing low-privileged code execution can create a symbolic link to manipulate the application into deleting an arbitrary file, which can be leveraged to escalate privileges to SYSTEM context and execute arbitrary code.

MitigationApply the vendor-supplied patch or update Comodo Firewall to the latest version. As an interim control, restrict write access to directories where cmdagent operates and monitor for suspicious symbolic link creation.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
FirewallApplication
Affected:= 12.2.2.8012

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify Comodo Firewall installation
    Check for the presence of Comodo Firewall on the system by looking for the installation directory (typically C:\Program Files\COMODO\ or C:\Program Files (x86)\COMODO\) or by querying the Windows registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\COMODO or HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall for Comodo entries
    Affected if Comodo Firewall is installed on the system
  2. Check installed Comodo Firewall version
    Locate the cmdagent.exe file (typically in C:\Program Files\COMODO\Comodo Firewall\ or C:\Program Files (x86)\COMODO\Comodo Firewall\) and right-click to view Properties, or query the registry uninstall key, or run 'wmic product where "name like '%Comodo%'" get version'
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 12.2.2.8012
  3. Verify cmdagent.exe is present and executable
    Confirm cmdagent.exe exists in the Comodo Firewall installation directory and check if the process is running using Task Manager or 'tasklist | findstr cmdagent'
    Affected if cmdagent.exe exists and is running with elevated privileges
  4. Inspect file deletion behavior through symlink manipulation
    As a low-privileged user, create a test symbolic link using 'mklink testlink.txt targetfile.txt' in a directory where cmdagent has write access, then observe if cmdagent can be induced to follow the link and delete the target file
    Affected if A low-privileged user can create symbolic links in directories used by cmdagent and the application follows those links to perform file operations

The system is affected if Comodo Firewall version 12.2.2.8012 is installed and cmdagent.exe is running with permissions that allow a low-privileged attacker to create symbolic links in its working directories.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the vendor-supplied patch or update Comodo Firewall to the latest version. As an interim control, restrict write access to directories where cmdagent operates and monitor for suspicious symbolic link creation.

Fix this in Firewall Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
7.0 hours of engineering $1,240
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-7249 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-7249 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data