CVE-2024-7940
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe product exposes a service that is intended for local only to all network interfaces without any authentication.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA service that was designed to operate only on localhost (127.0.0.1) is being bound to all network interfaces (0.0.0.0), making it accessible from any network location. Combined with the absence of authentication, remote attackers can interact with this service directly.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 10.2, < 10.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify MicroSCADA X Sys600 installation and versionLocate the MicroSCADA X Sys600 installation directory and check the version file or executable properties. Common locations may include C:\Program Files\Hitachi Energy\MicroSCADA or similar. Look for version information in about dialogs, README files, or the main executable.Affected if Installed version is >= 10.2 and < 10.6
-
Identify the vulnerable local serviceReview MicroSCADA X Sys600 documentation or configuration to identify which internal/local service is meant for loopback-only access. Common candidates include admin utilities, configuration services, or diagnostic tools.Affected if The identified service is present in the installation
-
Check network binding configuration of the serviceUse system utilities such as netstat, ss, or similar to examine which network addresses the vulnerable service is bound to. Look for entries showing 0.0.0.0 or ::: port bindings versus 127.0.0.1 or ::1 localhost bindings.Affected if The service is bound to 0.0.0.0 or ::: (all interfaces) rather than 127.0.0.1 or ::1 only
-
Verify remote accessibilityFrom a different machine on the network, attempt to connect to the suspected service port on the target system's IP address (not localhost). Use tools like telnet, nc, or curl depending on the service type.Affected if The service responds to connections from remote network addresses
-
Check firewall configurationExamine Windows Firewall or third-party firewall rules on the target system to see if the service port is allowed for inbound connections from remote addresses.Affected if Firewall permits inbound connections to the service from non-localhost sources
A system is affected if MicroSCADA X Sys600 version 10.2 through 10.5.x is installed and the local-only service is bound to 0.0.0.0 (all interfaces), making it accessible from remote network locations without authentication.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.6
Bind the service to localhost only (127.0.0.1) or implement authentication and authorized access controls. Alternatively, use firewall rules to restrict access to trusted IPs or block external access.
Microscada X Sys600 version 10.6
- 1. Back up all current system configurations, project files, and databases according to Hitachi Energy backup procedures for Microscada X Sys600
- 2. Download Microscada X Sys600 version 10.6 from the official Hitachi Energy support portal (publisher.hitachienergy.com)
- 3. Verify the integrity of the downloaded package using checksums provided by Hitachi Energy
- 4. Test the upgrade in a non-production (staging) environment to ensure compatibility with your specific configuration
- 5. Schedule a maintenance window and notify all relevant stakeholders
- 6. Stop all Microscada services and ensure no active operations are running
- 7. Install version 10.6 following the official Hitachi Energy installation and upgrade documentation
- 8. Restore the backed-up configurations to the upgraded system
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-7940 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-7940 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data