CVE-2025-39202
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability exists in in the Monitor Pro interface of the MicroSCADA X SYS600 product. An authenticated user with low privileges can see and overwrite files causing information leak and data corruption.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA path traversal or improper authorization vulnerability exists in the Monitor Pro interface of MicroSCADA X SYS600. An authenticated user with low privileges can read (see) and write (overwrite) arbitrary files on the system, leading to information disclosure and data corruption.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 10.0, < 10.7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed MicroSCADA versionQuery the system or check the product documentation for the installed version of Hitachienergy MicroSCADA X SYS600. This is typically available through the system information panel, installation directory, or product-specific command-line utility.Affected if The installed version is 10.0 or higher but lower than 10.7
-
Confirm Monitor Pro interface is accessibleVerify that the Monitor Pro interface component is installed and enabled on the system. Check the product's component list or configuration to confirm Monitor Pro is present.Affected if Monitor Pro interface is installed and accessible to users
-
Review user account privilegesExamine the user account configuration and privilege levels assigned within the MicroSCADA system. Identify accounts with low-privilege access to the Monitor Pro interface.Affected if Low-privilege user accounts exist with access to Monitor Pro
-
Test file access boundariesUsing a low-privilege authenticated account, attempt to access files outside the intended Monitor Pro working directory through the interface. This may involve checking if the application restricts file paths to authorized directories.Affected if The interface allows reading or writing files outside the expected scope for low-privilege users
-
Inspect file system permissionsReview the file system permissions and access control lists (ACLs) on the system to determine whether low-privilege accounts have been granted broader file access than intended.Affected if File permissions allow low-privilege users to read or overwrite arbitrary system files
You are affected if running MicroSCADA X SYS600 version 10.0 through 10.6 with Monitor Pro enabled and low-privilege users can access files outside their intended directory scope.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.7
Implement proper file system access controls and authorization checks in the Monitor Pro interface to ensure low-privilege users cannot read or write files outside their intended scope.
MicroSCADA X SYS600 version 10.7 or later
- 1. Verify current MicroSCADA X SYS600 version by accessing the system information panel or using the version check utility
- 2. Create a complete backup of the current system configuration, including all project files, databases, and settings
- 3. Schedule the upgrade during a planned maintenance window to minimize operational impact
- 4. Download the MicroSCADA X SYS600 version 10.7 or later from Hitachi Energy's official support portal at publisher.hitachienergy.com
- 5. Review all release notes and upgrade documentation for version 10.7 before proceeding
- 6. Execute the installer with administrative privileges, following the documented installation procedure
- 7. After installation, verify that the Monitor Pro interface properly enforces privilege boundaries for low-privilege users
- 8. Confirm that low-privilege users can no longer access or overwrite files outside their authorized scope
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-39202 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-39202 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data