CVE-2024-9200
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA post-authentication command injection vulnerability in the "host" parameter of the diagnostic function in Zyxel VMG4005-B50A firmware versions through V5.15(ABQA.2.2)C0 could allow an authenticated attacker with administrator privileges to execute operating system (OS) commands on a vulnerable device.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA post-authentication command injection vulnerability exists in the diagnostic function of Zyxel VMG4005-B50A routers. The 'host' parameter in the diagnostic feature does not properly sanitize user input, allowing an authenticated administrator to inject and execute arbitrary OS commands on the device.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 5.13\(abnp.8\)c1< 5.13\(ably.9\)c1< 5.15\(abqa.2.3\)c0< 5.15\(abqa.2.3\)c0< 5.13\(abrl.5.2\)c0< 5.13\(ably.9\)c1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the router modelCheck the device label or web interface for the exact model number (e.g., VMG4005-B50A, VMG3927-B50B, etc.)Affected if The model is one of: EMG6726-B10A, VMG3927-B50B, VMG4005-B50A, VMG4005-B60A, VMG4005-B50B, or VMG4927-B50A
-
Check the installed firmware versionAccess the router web interface (typically at 192.168.1.1) and navigate to Status or Maintenance > Firmware to view the current firmware versionAffected if The firmware version is lower than the fixed version for your specific model (Emg6726 < 5.13(abnp.8)c1, Vmg3927 < 5.13(ably.9)c1, Vmg4005-B50A/B60A < 5.15(abqa.2.3)c0, Vmg4005-B50B < 5.13(abrl.5.2)c0, Vmg4927 < 5.13(ably.9)c1)
-
Verify admin credentials existCheck if there are active administrator accounts configured on the device under User Account or Administrator settingsAffected if At least one administrator account is configured and enabled on the router
-
Check diagnostic feature accessibilityLocate the diagnostic or ping test function in the router web interface, typically under Advanced Settings, Network Diagnostics, or TroubleshootingAffected if The diagnostic feature with a 'host' or 'ping' parameter is accessible to authenticated administrators
You are affected if your Zyxel router model matches one of the six listed models AND your firmware version is below the specified patch level for that model, and an administrator account exists on the device.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.135.15
Apply the latest vendor firmware patch when available; until then, restrict administrative access to trusted IPs only and consider network segmentation to limit exposure, as the vulnerability requires admin-level authentication.
Zyxel firmware 5.13(abnp.8)c1 / 5.13(ably.9)c1 / 5.15(abqa.2.3)c0 / 5.13(abrl.5.2)c0 depending on device model
- 1. Identify the exact model number and current firmware version of the Zyxel device from the web GUI or label on the device
- 2. Navigate to Zyxel support website (www.zyxel.com) and locate the firmware download section for your specific device model
- 3. Download the firmware version equal to or newer than the fixed version for your model: Emg6726 B10a → 5.13(abnp.8)c1, Vmg3927 B50b → 5.13(ably.9)c1, Vmg4005 B50a → 5.15(abqa.2.3)c0, Vmg4005 B60a → 5.15(abqa.2.3)c0, Vmg4005 B50b → 5.13(abrl.5.2)c0, Vmg4927 B50a → 5.13(ably.9)c1
- 4. Log in to the device web interface with administrator credentials
- 5. Navigate to Administration > Firmware Upgrade or similar section
- 6. Upload the downloaded firmware file and initiate the upgrade process
- 7. Wait for the upgrade to complete and the device to reboot automatically
- 8. Verify the new firmware version is installed and the device is functioning normally
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-9200 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-9200 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data