CVE-2024-9950
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in Forescout SecureConnector v11.3.07.0109 on Windows allows unauthenticated user to modify compliance scripts due to insecure temporary directory.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceForescout SecureConnector v11.3.07.0109 on Windows uses an insecure temporary directory for handling compliance scripts, allowing unauthenticated local users to modify these scripts. This likely stems from the application using a world-writable temp location (e.g., %TEMP% with improper ACLs or a predictable temp path), enabling a race condition or direct tampering that can lead to arbitrary code execution with elevated privileges when compliance scripts are executed.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 11.3.07.0109, < 11.3.12CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Forescout SecureConnector is installedCheck for SecureConnector installation on the Windows system - look in Program Files or Program Files (x86) for a Forescout folder, or check Windows Services for a SecureConnector serviceAffected if SecureConnector is present on the system
-
Determine installed SecureConnector versionUse Windows Registry or program information to find the exact version number - check HKLM\SOFTWARE\Forescout\SecureConnector or the program's version info in the installation directoryAffected if Version is >= 11.3.07.0109 and < 11.3.12
-
Locate the temporary directory used by SecureConnectorExamine process behavior or configuration to find where SecureConnector stores temporary files during compliance script handling - this may be the system TEMP folder (%TEMP% or %TMP%) or a subfolder within the SecureConnector installationAffected if Temporary files are stored in a world-writable location accessible to non-admin users
-
Check permissions on the temporary directoryReview ACLs on the temp directory used by SecureConnector to determine if non-privileged users have write access - verify if Authenticated Users or Users group have Modify or Write permissionsAffected if Non-admin users have write/modify permissions to the temp directory
-
Inspect compliance scripts and their storage locationLocate compliance scripts handled by SecureConnector and verify their storage location and file permissions - check if scripts are temporarily stored in an unprotected location before executionAffected if Compliance scripts are written to or stored in a location writable by non-admin users
A system is affected if Forescout SecureConnector version is between 11.3.07.0109 and 11.3.12 (inclusive) AND the temporary directory used for compliance scripts has weak permissions allowing non-admin users to modify script files before execution.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped11.3.12
Restrict permissions on the temporary directory used by SecureConnector, or upgrade to a version that uses secure temporary file handling (e.g., using Windows API GetTempPath with proper ACLs). Verify compliance scripts cannot be modified by non-admin users.
SecureConnector 11.3.12 or later
- Identify all Windows systems running Forescout SecureConnector with versions 11.3.07.0109 through 11.3.11 using your asset inventory or by checking the SecureConnector version on each endpoint
- Obtain SecureConnector version 11.3.12 or later from the Forescout support portal (support.forescout.com) or your designated vendor distribution channel
- Test the upgrade in a non-production environment to ensure compatibility with your existing Forescout platform and managed systems
- Apply the upgrade to production systems following your organization's change management procedures
- Verify successful installation by confirming the SecureConnector version displays as 11.3.12 or later on managed endpoints
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-9950 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-9950 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data