CVE-2025-0513
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn affected versions of Octopus Server error messages were handled unsafely on the error page. If an adversary could control any part of the error message they could embed code which may impact the user viewing the error message.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceOctopus Server contains a reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in its error page handling. User-controlled error message content is rendered unsafely without proper sanitization or encoding, allowing an attacker to inject malicious script that executes in the context of a victim's browser when viewing error pages.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2024.3.164, < 2024.3.12985>= 2024.4.401, < 2024.4.6962CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Octopus Server versionLocate the installed Octopus Server version via the web interface (Help > About), REST API endpoint /api/about, or server logsAffected if The installed version falls within 2024.3.164 to 2024.3.12985, or 2024.4.401 to 2024.4.6962
-
Compare version to affected rangesCompare your installed version number against the affected ranges: >= 2024.3.164 and < 2024.3.12985, or >= 2024.4.401 and < 2024.4.6962Affected if Your version is greater than or equal to 2024.3.164 but less than 2024.3.12985, OR greater than or equal to 2024.4.401 but less than 2024.4.6962
-
Verify web interface accessibilityConfirm the Octopus Server web interface is accessible to users or attackers who could trigger error conditionsAffected if The web interface is exposed and users can trigger error conditions that display error pages
-
Identify custom error handlingReview any custom error handlers, error message templates, or integrations that pass user-supplied input into error page contentAffected if Custom error handlers or integrations pass user-controlled content into error page rendering without sanitization
-
Audit error logging configurationCheck if error responses can include unsanitized user input in the error message field (for example, via query parameters or form submissions that trigger errors)Affected if User-supplied input can be reflected in error page messages without proper encoding
You are affected if your Octopus Server version is within the specified vulnerable ranges AND your web interface can display error pages containing user-controlled content.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2024.3.129852024.4.6962
Implement context-appropriate output encoding for all error message content before rendering on the error page. Alternatively, deploy the vendor patch when available.
Upgrade to Octopus Server 2024.3.12985 (for 2024.3.x users) or 2024.4.6962 (for 2024.4.x users), or any later stable release in the respective branch
- Identify the current Octopus Server version by navigating to Configuration > Nodes in the Octopus Web Portal, or by running `octopus --version` from the server CLI
- Determine which release branch is in use (2024.3.x or 2024.4.x) to select the appropriate upgrade path
- Download the fixed version: 2024.3.12985 for the 2024.3 branch, or 2024.4.6962 for the 2024.4 branch (or a later stable release in the same branch)
- Follow standard Octopus Server upgrade procedures: back up the database, stop the Octopus service, run the installer for the new version, and verify the upgrade completes successfully
- After upgrade, confirm the version matches the expected fixed release in Configuration > Nodes
- Test that error pages render without executing any injected scripts to verify the XSS fix is working
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,512.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-0513 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-0513 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data