CVE-2025-0585
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe a+HRD from aEnrich Technology has a SQL Injection vulnerability, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to inject arbitrary SQL commands to read, modify, and delete database contents.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe a+HRD application from aEnrich Technology contains a SQL Injection vulnerability that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to inject arbitrary SQL commands. This critical flaw enables full database compromise including unauthorized read, modification, and deletion of data.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 7.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify a+HRD installation and versionLocate the application installation directory or check the software inventory/banner for 'aEnrich A+HRD' and note the exact version numberAffected if Version is 7.5 or lower (any version up to and including 7.5)
-
Verify the web application module is enabledCheck if the a+HRD web interface is installed and running. Look for web server configurations (IIS, Apache, or built-in web server) hosting the a+HRD applicationAffected if The web application module is accessible and serving a+HRD pages
-
Confirm network exposure of the login/authentication interfaceIdentify the URL endpoints that serve the a+HRD login page or any public-facing input forms (typically found in the application's web root under /login, /auth, or the root path)Affected if The a+HRD web interface is exposed to untrusted networks or the internet
-
Inspect HTTP request handling for SQL injection pointsReview the application's source code, configuration, or proxy logs to identify parameters passed to database queries, particularly in authentication or search functionsAffected if User-supplied input in HTTP requests is directly used in SQL queries without parameterized queries
You are affected if a+HRD version 7.5 or lower is installed with the web module enabled and accessible, where HTTP parameters are processed through unparameterized SQL queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataremediate by implementing parameterized queries or prepared statements to neutralize SQL injection vectors, followed by comprehensive security testing to verify the fix.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-0585 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-0585 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data