A\+hrdApplication · Aenrich

CVE-2025-12871

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-11-12
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 7.5 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The a+HRD developed by aEnrich has an Authentication Abuse vulnerability, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to craft administrator access tokens and use them to access the system with elevated privileges.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The a+HRD application by aEnrich contains an authentication abuse vulnerability where the token generation or validation mechanism can be bypassed, allowing unauthenticated attackers to craft valid administrator-level access tokens and gain elevated privileges without valid credentials.

MitigationImplement cryptographically secure token generation with proper validation, enforce server-side authentication checks, and review token issuance logic to prevent unauthorized admin token creation.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
A\+hrdApplication
Affected:<= 7.5

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed a+HRD version
    Locate the version information for your aEnrich a+HRD installation through the application's admin panel, version info page, or installation documentation
    Affected if The installed version is 7.5 or lower
  2. Verify if token generation endpoints are exposed
    Review your web server or application configuration to identify any endpoints related to token generation, authentication, or login that are accessible without authentication
    Affected if Token generation or authentication endpoints are accessible from untrusted networks without authentication requirements
  3. Inspect token issuance configuration
    Examine the application's authentication configuration files or settings to determine how access tokens are generated and whether server-side validation is enforced
    Affected if Token generation does not require server-side validation or uses weak/predictable algorithms
  4. Test for token generation bypass
    Using a controlled test environment, attempt to craft an administrator-level access token without providing valid credentials to see if the token is accepted by the application
    Affected if The application accepts manually crafted tokens as valid administrator sessions without validating against a trusted token store
  5. Review token validation logic
    Check the application's source code or configuration for the token validation routine to confirm it properly verifies tokens against the server's authentication state before granting access
    Affected if The validation logic allows tokens to be accepted without proper server-side verification of credential validity

You are affected if you are running aEnrich a+HRD version 7.5 or lower and your environment allows token generation or validation to be bypassed.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 7.5
Interim mitigation

Implement cryptographically secure token generation with proper validation, enforce server-side authentication checks, and review token issuance logic to prevent unauthorized admin token creation.

Fix this in A\+hrd Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-12871 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-12871 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data