CVE-2025-0589
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn affected versions of Octopus Deploy where customers are using Active Directory for authentication it was possible for an unauthenticated user to make an API request against two endpoints which would retrieve some data from the associated Active Directory. The requests when crafted correctly would return specific information from user profiles (Email address/UPN and Display name) from one endpoint and group information ( Group ID and Display name) from the other. This vulnerability does not expose data within the Octopus Server product itself.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceOctopus Deploy versions using Active Directory authentication contain two API endpoints accessible to unauthenticated users that return sensitive AD user profile information (email/UPN, display name) and group information (group ID, display name). This information disclosure does not expose Octopus Server internal data but exposes organizational directory metadata to anonymous attackers.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2020.3.3, < 2024.3.13071>= 2024.4.401, < 2024.4.7065CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Octopus Server installation and versionLocate the Octopus Server instance and determine its installed version number (typically visible in the UI under About or in the server logs)Affected if The installed version falls within >= 2020.3.3, < 2024.3.13071 OR >= 2024.4.401, < 2024.4.7065
-
Verify Active Directory authentication is enabledCheck the Octopus Server authentication configuration to confirm Active Directory (or Azure AD/Integrated Windows Authentication) is configured as an authentication providerAffected if Active Directory authentication is enabled and configured on the Octopus Server
-
Test unauthenticated access to user profile API endpointSend an HTTP request to the suspected user info API endpoint without providing authentication credentials (common paths include /api/users/me or similar AD-related endpoints)Affected if The endpoint returns AD user profile information such as email, UPN, or display name without requiring authentication
-
Test unauthenticated access to group information API endpointSend an HTTP request to the suspected group API endpoint without providing authentication credentialsAffected if The endpoint returns AD group information such as group IDs or display names without requiring authentication
The environment is affected if Octopus Server version is in the vulnerable range, Active Directory authentication is configured, and either API endpoint returns sensitive AD information to unauthenticated requests.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2024.3.130712024.4.7065
Apply vendor-supplied patch or hotfix for CVE-2025-0589. If unavailable, temporarily disable AD authentication or implement network-level access controls to restrict these API endpoints until a fix is available.
2024.3.13071 or later (2024.3.x LTS); 2024.4.7065 or later (2024.4.x)
- 1. Identify the current Octopus Server version by navigating to the Configuration > Nodes page in the Octopus Web Portal
- 2. If running a version >= 2020.3.3 and < 2024.3.13071, plan an upgrade to version 2024.3.13071 or later in the 2024.3.x LTS release line
- 3. If running a version >= 2024.4.401 and < 2024.4.7065, plan an upgrade to version 2024.4.7065 or later in the 2024.4.x release line
- 4. Before upgrading, review the Octopus Deploy release notes for the target version to understand any required migration steps
- 5. Perform a full backup of the Octopus database and configuration following standard backup procedures
- 6. Execute the upgrade following Octopus Deploy upgrade documentation
- 7. After upgrade, verify the Active Directory authentication is functioning correctly by testing user logins
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-0589 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-0589 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data