CVE-2025-0684
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA flaw was found in grub2. When performing a symlink lookup from a reiserfs filesystem, grub's reiserfs fs module uses user-controlled parameters from the filesystem geometry to determine the internal buffer size, however, it improperly checks for integer overflows. A maliciouly crafted filesystem may lead some of those buffer size calculations to overflow, causing it to perform a grub_malloc() operation with a smaller size than expected. As a result, the grub_reiserfs_read_symlink() will call grub_reiserfs_read_real() with a overflown length parameter, leading to a heap based out-of-bounds write during data reading. This flaw may be leveraged to corrupt grub's internal critical data and can result in arbitrary code execution, by-passing secure boot protections.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceInteger overflow in grub2's reiserfs module allows a maliciously crafted filesystem to cause buffer size calculations to underflow, leading to heap-based out-of-bounds write during symlink reading. This can corrupt critical data and enable arbitrary code execution, bypassing Secure Boot protections.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2.12CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed grub2 versionRun 'grub2-install --version' or check your distribution's package manager for the grub2 version installed (e.g., 'rpm -q grub2' or 'dpkg -l grub2')Affected if The installed version is 2.12 or lower (the vulnerability exists in grub2 <= 2.12)
-
Locate the reiserfs grub moduleSearch for the reiserfs module file in grub's module directory - common paths include /usr/lib/grub/*/reiserfs.mod or /boot/grub/*/reiserfs.modAffected if The reiserfs module file exists on the system (vulnerability requires this module to be present)
-
Check if reiserfs module is loaded in grub configInspect your grub.cfg or grub configuration for 'insmod reiserfs' or 'load_module reiserfs' statements indicating the module is enabledAffected if The reiserfs module is loaded or could be loaded at boot time (the vulnerable code path is only reachable when the module is active)
-
Determine if reiserfs filesystem usage is possibleReview /etc/fstab and mounted filesystems to check if any reiserfs volumes exist or could be connected; check bootloader configuration for any reiserfs-related menu entriesAffected if Reiserfs filesystems are present or could be presented to grub at boot (exploitation requires mounting a malicious reiserfs volume)
You are affected if grub2 version is 2.12 or lower AND the reiserfs module is available/loadable on your system and could be triggered by mounting a reiserfs filesystem.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate grub2 to patched version, re-sign bootloader for Secure Boot if applicable, and consider disabling reiserfs support in grub if not required.
Grub2 version greater than 2.12 (check vendor security advisory for exact fixed version)
- Check your current grub2 version using: rpm -qa | grep grub2 or dpkg -l | grep grub2
- Verify the reiserfs-progs package is also updated: rpm -qa | grep reiserfs
- For RHEL/CentOS systems, update via: yum update grub2* or dnf update grub2*
- After update, regenerate grub configuration: grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg (or /boot/efi/EFI/*/grub.cfg for UEFI systems)
- Reboot the system to load the updated grub bootloader
- Verify the new grub version is loaded: grub2-install --version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-0684 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-0684 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data