CVE-2025-0881
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was found in Codezips Gym Management System 1.0. It has been classified as critical. Affected is an unknown function of the file /dashboard/admin/saveroutine.php. The manipulation of the argument rname leads to sql injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in Codezips Gym Management System 1.0 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to inject malicious SQL queries via the 'rname' parameter in /dashboard/admin/saveroutine.php, potentially leading to full database compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Codezips Gym Management System is installedSearch the web server for the presence of Codezips Gym Management System. Look for the /dashboard/admin/ directory structure which contains saveroutine.phpAffected if The application Codezips Gym Management System is present on the server
-
Verify the installed version is 1.0Locate version information in application files, README files, or configuration files. The vulnerability affects specifically version 1.0Affected if The installed version is Codezips Gym Management System version 1.0
-
Confirm the vulnerable file existsCheck if /dashboard/admin/saveroutine.php exists in the web root. This is the file containing the SQL injection flaw in the 'rname' parameterAffected if The file saveroutine.php exists and is web-accessible
-
Verify the application endpoint is reachable without authenticationConfirm that the /dashboard/admin/saveroutine.php endpoint can be accessed without authentication. The SQL injection can be exploited by unauthenticated remote attackersAffected if The endpoint is accessible to unauthenticated users
The environment is affected if Codezips Gym Management System version 1.0 is installed with the vulnerable saveroutine.php file accessible without authentication.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement prepared statements/parameterized queries for all database operations, particularly for user-supplied input in saveroutine.php, and conduct a comprehensive code review to identify and fix similar SQL injection flaws across the application.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-0881 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-0881 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data