CVE-2025-10090
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA flaw has been found in Jinher OA up to 1.2. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /C6/Jhsoft.Web.departments/GetTreeDate.aspx. Executing manipulation of the argument ID can lead to sql injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceJinher OA versions up to 1.2 contain a SQL injection vulnerability in the /C6/Jhsoft.Web.departments/GetTreeDate.aspx endpoint. The ID parameter is not properly sanitized before being used in database queries, allowing remote attackers to inject arbitrary SQL commands. This is a critical unauthenticated SQL injection vulnerability with publicly available exploits.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Jinher OA installationIdentify if Jinher OA is deployed in your environment by checking web application directories, server logs, or network scanning for Jinher OA responsesAffected if Jinher OA software is present in the environment
-
Determine installed Jinher OA versionLocate version information through application banners, configuration files, release notes, or the application login pageAffected if The installed version is 1.2 or any version lower than 1.2
-
Verify vulnerable endpoint accessibilityAttempt to access the URL path /C6/Jhsoft.Web.departments/GetTreeDate.aspx on the Jinher OA serverAffected if The endpoint returns any HTTP response (200, 404, or error), indicating the application path exists
-
Check if ID parameter is acceptedSend a request to GetTreeDate.aspx with an ID parameter (e.g., ?ID=1) and observe if the parameter is processed by the applicationAffected if The ID parameter is accepted and the application processes it without rejecting or sanitizing the input
You are affected if Jinher OA version 1.2 or lower is installed and the /C6/Jhsoft.Web.departments/GetTreeDate.aspx endpoint with the ID parameter is accessible and processes unsanitized input.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImmediately restrict network access to the affected Jinher OA system and apply vendor patches if available. If no patch exists, implement parameterized queries or stored procedures for the GetTreeDate.aspx ID parameter and audit other endpoints for similar injection flaws.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-10090 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-10090 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data