CVE-2025-10816
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA security flaw has been discovered in Jinher OA 2.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /c6/Jhsoft.Web.module/ToolBar/GetWordFileName.aspx/?text=GetUrl&style=add of the component XML Handler. Performing manipulation results in xml external entity reference. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn XML External Entity (XXE) injection vulnerability exists in Jinher OA 2.0's XML Handler component via the GetWordFileName.aspx file. The application processes XML input without disabling external entity resolution, allowing remote attackers to inject malicious XML that can read local files, perform SSRF attacks, or cause denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Jinher OA version 2.0 installationLocate and inspect the application's version information, typically found in assembly metadata, an about page, or configuration files within the Jinher OA web root directory.Affected if The installed version is Jinher OA version 2.0 exactly.
-
Locate the GetWordFileName.aspx fileSearch the web application directory for the file GetWordFileName.aspx, which is the vulnerable component handling XML input.Affected if The file exists in the application's web root or any subdirectory.
-
Verify XML processing functionalityIdentify if the GetWordFileName.aspx endpoint accepts XML input or handles .xml file uploads. Check if the feature is actively used or accessible via the web interface.Affected if The application processes XML files through this endpoint.
-
Inspect XML parser configurationExamine the application's configuration files or source code for the XML Handler component to determine if external entity resolution is enabled in the XML parser settings.Affected if External entity processing is not explicitly disabled in the XML parser configuration.
A user is affected if they are running Jinher OA version 2.0 with the GetWordFileName.aspx endpoint accessible and the XML parser configured to allow external entity resolution.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataDisable external entity processing in the XML parser configuration, implement strict input validation for XML uploads, and apply vendor patches if available. Until patched, consider network segmentation or WAF rules to block malicious XML payloads.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,544.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-10816 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-10816 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data