CVE-2025-10223
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedInsufficient Session Expiration (CWE-613) in the Web Admin Panel in AxxonSoft Axxon One (C-Werk) prior to 2.0.3 on Windows allows a local or remote authenticated attacker to retain access with removed privileges via continued use of an unexpired session token until natural expiration.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAxxonSoft Axxon One Web Admin Panel prior to version 2.0.3 on Windows does not properly invalidate session tokens when user privileges are removed or user roles are changed. An authenticated attacker whose privileges have been revoked can continue using the existing session token until it naturally expires, maintaining unauthorized access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2.0.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Axxon One installation and versionLocate the Axxon One installation directory on the Windows system and check the version information, typically found in application metadata, About dialog, or installation logsAffected if The installed version is 2.0.2 or earlier (any version up to and including 2.0.2)
-
Confirm Web Admin Panel is accessibleVerify that the Axxon One Web Admin Panel interface is enabled and accessible on the network or locallyAffected if The Web Admin Panel is exposed and users can authenticate to it
-
Determine if user privilege management is in useCheck if the Axxon One system has multiple user accounts with role-based access control configured in the administration settingsAffected if The system uses role-based access control with users who have varying privilege levels
-
Assess session token expiration settingsReview the session configuration for the Web Admin Panel to determine the current session lifetime durationAffected if Session tokens have long expiration times (hours to days), increasing the window of unauthorized access after privilege revocation
You are affected if running Axxon One version 2.0.2 or earlier with the Web Admin Panel enabled, and users with changing privileges or roles exist in the system - the vulnerability allows former users to retain access via existing sessions until those sessions naturally expire.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to AxxonSoft Axxon One version 2.0.3 or later. As a compensating control, consider reducing session lifetimes and implementing immediate session revocation mechanisms for administrative actions that modify user privileges.
2.0.3
- 1. Verify current Axxon One version is <= 2.0.2 by checking the Web Admin Panel or system information
- 2. Back up all Axxon One configuration data, databases, and any custom settings according to vendor backup procedures
- 3. Download Axxon One version 2.0.3 from the official AxxonSoft website (www.axxonsoft.com) or authorized distribution channel
- 4. Stop all Axxon One services and ensure no active recordings or operations are in progress
- 5. Install Axxon One 2.0.3 following the vendor's installation instructions for your Windows environment
- 6. Restore configuration from backup if needed after installation
- 7. Start Axxon One services and verify the application is running correctly
- 8. Test session expiration behavior in the Web Admin Panel to confirm the fix is working
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,960.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-10223 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-10223 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data