CVE-2025-10224
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Authentication (CWE-287) in the LDAP authentication engine in AxxonSoft Axxon One (C-Werk) 2.0.2 and earlier on Windows allows a remote authenticated user to be denied access or misassigned roles via incorrect evaluation of nested LDAP group memberships during login.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe LDAP authentication engine in AxxonSoft Axxon One (C-Werk) 2.0.2 and earlier on Windows incorrectly evaluates nested LDAP group memberships during login. This improper group membership resolution causes authenticated remote users to be either denied access they should have or assigned incorrect roles based on incomplete group membership traversal.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2.0.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm AxxonSoft Axxon One versionLocate the installed version of AxxonSoft Axxon One (C-Werk) in Windows Programs and Features or the application About/Help sectionAffected if the installed version is 2.0.2 or earlier
-
Verify LDAP authentication is configuredAccess the Axxon One admin interface or configuration files and confirm LDAP authentication is enabled for user loginAffected if LDAP authentication is active and in use for user access control
-
Inspect LDAP group structureReview the LDAP directory configuration or consult with LDAP administrators to identify the presence of nested or hierarchical group membershipsAffected if nested LDAP groups exist in the authentication hierarchy where parent groups contain child groups as members
The environment is affected if AxxonSoft Axxon One version 2.0.2 or earlier is installed, LDAP authentication is configured, and nested LDAP group structures are in use, potentially causing incorrect role assignment or access denial during login.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to AxxonSoft version newer than 2.0.2 where nested LDAP group membership evaluation is corrected, or work with LDAP administrators to flatten group hierarchies to avoid deep nesting that triggers the evaluation bug.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-10224 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-10224 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data