CVE-2025-10258
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedInfinera DNA is vulnerable to a time-based SQL injection vulnerability due to insufficient input validation, which may result in leaking of sensitive information.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceInfinera DNA contains a time-based SQL injection vulnerability stemming from insufficient input validation on user-supplied data that gets incorporated into SQL queries without proper sanitization or parameterization. This allows attackers to inject malicious SQL code that can cause time delays, enabling inference-based extraction of sensitive data from the database.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< r24.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Infinera DNA versionAccess the system admin interface or use the CLI command 'show version' or 'software version' to retrieve the installed DNA version numberAffected if Installed version is earlier than r24.2 (e.g., r24.1, r23.x, earlier releases)
-
Identify SQL query entry pointsReview web application configuration or proxy logs to identify endpoints that accept user-supplied input and pass it to database queriesAffected if User-accessible endpoints accept input that gets incorporated into SQL statements without visible parameterization
System is affected if Infinera DNA version is below r24.2 and the web interface exposes input fields that flow into SQL queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedImplement proper input validation and use parameterized queries or prepared statements for all database interactions to prevent SQL injection. Conduct a comprehensive code review of all query-generating code paths to identify and remediate additional injection points.
r24.2
- Review Infinera DNA upgrade documentation and release notes for r24.2 before proceeding
- Schedule a maintenance window suitable for production systems
- Back up current DNA configuration, database, and all critical data
- Download the r24.2 release package from Nokia's official support portal
- Follow Infinera's standard upgrade procedure for DNA appliances (typically via CLI or management interface)
- Verify the upgrade completed successfully by checking the DNA version number
- After upgrade, validate that the SQL injection vulnerability is resolved by confirming the version displays r24.2 or later
- Test critical DNA functionality to ensure normal operation post-upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-10258 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-10258 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data