CVE-2025-1029
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUse of Hard-coded Credentials vulnerability in Utarit Information Services Inc. SoliClub allows Read Sensitive Constants Within an Executable. This issue affects SoliClub: from 5.2.4 before 5.3.7.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceHard-coded credentials embedded in the SoliClub executable (versions 5.2.4 to before 5.3.7) can be extracted by attackers through static analysis or by reading sensitive constants within the binary, potentially allowing unauthorized access to the application or backend services.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 5.2.4, < 5.3.7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed SoliClub versionLocate the SoliClub executable or application installation directory, then check the version information (typically via executable properties, an about dialog within the application, or a version file in the installation folder).Affected if The installed version is 5.2.4 or higher but lower than 5.3.7.
-
Compare version against the affected rangeTake the identified version number and verify whether it falls within the range >= 5.2.4 and < 5.3.7.Affected if The version falls within 5.2.4 to 5.3.6 inclusive.
-
Inspect the executable for embedded credentialsPerform static analysis on the SoliClub executable using tools such as 'strings', 'binwalk', or a disassembler to search for hardcoded usernames, passwords, API keys, or authentication tokens stored as constants within the binary.Affected if Sensitive credentials or authentication secrets are found embedded as readable strings or constants in the binary.
You are affected if the installed Utarit Soliclub version is between 5.2.4 and 5.3.6 inclusive AND static analysis of the executable reveals hardcoded credentials.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.3.7
Replace all hardcoded credentials with secure credential management solutions such as environment variables, secrets vaults, or externalized configuration files, and rotate any credentials that may have been exposed.
5.3.7
- Upgrade SoliClub from any version >= 5.2.4 and < 5.3.7 to version 5.3.7 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation10.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,664.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-1029 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-1029 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data