CVE-2025-7047
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authorization vulnerability in Utarit Informatics Services Inc. SoliClub allows Privilege Abuse. This issue affects SoliClub: before 5.3.7.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMissing authorization in SoliClub allows authenticated users to perform actions outside their intended privilege level. The vulnerability enables privilege abuse where users with lower permissions can access or modify resources they should not have access to, likely due to missing access control checks on certain API endpoints or functions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 5.3.7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed SoliClub versionLocate the version file or check the application header/footer for the version number. Common locations include: version.php, about.php, or the admin dashboard 'System Info' page. Compare the version to the affected range (< 5.3.7).Affected if The installed version is below 5.3.7
-
Enumerate accessible API endpointsReview the application's API route definitions or controller files. Look for endpoints that handle user actions, data access, or administrative functions without visible authorization decorators or permission checks.Affected if API endpoints exist that lack proper authorization decorators or access control checks
-
Test cross-privilege accessCreate or use two test accounts with different privilege levels (e.g., basic user and moderator). Attempt to perform actions from the lower-privilege account that should require higher permissions, such as accessing admin functions, modifying other users' data, or viewing restricted resources.Affected if Lower-privilege users can successfully perform actions restricted to higher-privilege roles
-
Review access control configurationInspect the application's authentication/authorization configuration files (e.g., config/auth.php, config/permissions.php, or similar). Verify that role-based access control (RBAC) is properly defined and enforced across controllers.Affected if No RBAC enforcement found or access control is not applied to sensitive endpoints
-
Audit database role assignmentsQuery the database to inspect user role assignments and permission tables. Check if users are assigned correct roles and if role-to-permission mappings are properly configured.Affected if Users have been assigned roles that grant elevated permissions beyond their intended level
The environment is affected if the installed SoliClub version is below 5.3.7 and lower-privilege users can access or modify resources intended for higher-privilege roles.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.3.7
Upgrade SoliClub to version 5.3.7 or later to receive the authorization fix. Conduct a comprehensive access control review to identify and remediate other similar authorization gaps.
SoliClub 5.3.7
- Upgrade SoliClub to version 5.3.7 or later as provided by Utarit Informatics Services Inc.
- Verify the upgrade was successful and the authorization controls are functioning correctly.
- Confirm the new version is running by checking the application version information.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,448.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-7047 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-7047 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data