RuoyiApplication

CVE-2025-10384

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-09-13
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 4.8.1 or later.
See remediation →
60/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A flaw has been found in yangzongzhuan RuoYi up to 4.8.1. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /system/role/authUser/cancelAll of the component Role Handler. Executing manipulation of the argument roleId/userIds can lead to improper authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

This is an improper authorization vulnerability in the yangzongzhuan RuoYi admin framework (versions up to 4.8.1). The /system/role/authUser/cancelAll endpoint that handles removal of user role assignments fails to properly validate user permissions before allowing manipulation of the roleId/userIds parameters, potentially allowing authenticated users to modify role associations they should not have access to.

MitigationUpgrade to a patched version of RuoYi beyond 4.8.1. If no patched version is available, implement proper role-based access control (RBAC) validation checks on the affected endpoint to verify the requesting user has appropriate permissions before allowing role assignment modifications.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
RuoyiApplication
Affected:<= 4.8.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify RuoYi framework version
    Locate the version identifier in the application's build configuration, pom.xml file, or version manifest typically found in the WEB-INF or root directory of the deployed application
    Affected if The identified version is 4.8.1 or any version lower than 4.8.1
  2. Verify the vulnerable endpoint exists
    Check if the /system/role/authUser/cancelAll endpoint is present in the deployed application's routing configuration or API documentation
    Affected if The endpoint is exposed and accessible in the application
  3. Examine role authorization configuration
    Review the security configuration files and the controller implementation for /system/role/authUser/cancelAll to determine whether role-based permission checks are performed before processing role removal requests
    Affected if The endpoint lacks proper authorization validation for the roleId and userIds parameters, allowing manipulation by unauthorized authenticated users
  4. Review role assignment permission boundaries
    Inspect the database or role management module to determine which roles the current authenticated user is permitted to modify, and compare against what the vulnerable endpoint would allow
    Affected if The endpoint permits modification of role associations outside the requesting user's authorized scope

A user is affected if the deployed RuoYi version is 4.8.1 or lower and the /system/role/authUser/cancelAll endpoint is accessible without proper authorization validation for the roleId and userIds parameters.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 4.8.1
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to a patched version of RuoYi beyond 4.8.1. If no patched version is available, implement proper role-based access control (RBAC) validation checks on the affected endpoint to verify the requesting user has appropriate permissions before allowing role assignment modifications.

Fix this in Ruoyi Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,640
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-10384 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-10384 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data