CVE-2025-11487
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA security flaw has been discovered in SourceCodester Farm Management System 1.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /uploadProduct.php. Performing manipulation of the argument Type results in sql injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in SourceCodester Farm Management System 1.0's /uploadProduct.php file allows remote attackers to inject malicious SQL queries through the 'Type' parameter. This critical flaw (CVSS 9.8) enables complete database compromise, including potential data exfiltration or administrative access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm the Farm Management System is installedSearch the web root for directories or files containing 'farm' or 'janobe' in the name, and look for uploadProduct.phpAffected if The application directory contains Farm Management System files with uploadProduct.php present
-
Identify the installed versionCheck for a version file, README, or any file containing '1.0' as the version. Also examine the page source or configuration files for version indicatorsAffected if The installed version is exactly 1.0 (Janobe Farm Management System)
-
Locate the vulnerable uploadProduct.php fileNavigate to the web-accessible directory and locate the uploadProduct.php file. Common paths may include /farm/ or /janobe/ subdirectoriesAffected if The uploadProduct.php file exists in the web application directory
-
Verify the Type parameter is processed unsafelyExamine the uploadProduct.php source code and look for SQL queries that incorporate the 'Type' POST or GET parameter directly without using prepared statements, parameter binding, or escaping functionsAffected if The 'Type' parameter is used in SQL queries without parameterized binding or input sanitization
If the Farm Management System version 1.0 is installed with uploadProduct.php present and the Type parameter is used in unsafe SQL queries, the environment is affected by this CVE.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement prepared statements/parameterized queries for all database interactions, particularly the Type parameter in uploadProduct.php. Additionally, apply input validation and output encoding. Since this is a known public exploit, immediate isolation or patching is critical.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-11487 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-11487 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data