CVE-2025-9811
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was found in Campcodes Farm Management System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /reviewInput.php. Performing manipulation of the argument rating results in sql injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in Campcodes Farm Management System 1.0 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary SQL commands via the 'rating' parameter in /reviewInput.php. The exploit is publicly available and can be exploited remotely without authentication.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Campcodes Farm Management System installationLocate the web application's document root and verify the presence of Farm Management System files. Check for the presence of reviewInput.php in the web directory structure.Affected if The application is installed and reviewInput.php exists in the web-accessible directory.
-
Confirm installed version is 1.0Check version.php, README, or any version metadata file in the application root for the exact version number. Compare against the affected version range.Affected if The installed version is exactly 1.0.
-
Verify the vulnerable endpoint is accessibleAttempt to access the reviewInput.php file via HTTP/HTTPS to confirm it is exposed. Use a tool like curl or a browser request to check if the endpoint responds.Affected if The file /reviewInput.php is accessible over the network without authentication.
-
Test if the rating parameter accepts inputSend a crafted GET or POST request to reviewInput.php with a test value in the rating parameter (e.g., rating=1). Observe if the parameter is processed by the application.Affected if The rating parameter is accepted and processed by the application without proper sanitization.
You are affected if the Campcodes Farm Management System version 1.0 is running with reviewInput.php accessible and the rating parameter is accepted as user input.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImmediately parameterize all database queries using prepared statements, implement input validation on the rating parameter, and apply the vendor patch when available. As a stopgap, disable the affected functionality or implement Web Application Firewall rules.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-9811 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-9811 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data