CVE-2025-11614
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was identified in SourceCodester Best Salon Management System 1.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /panel/edit-appointment.php. Such manipulation of the argument editid leads to sql injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in SourceCodester Best Salon Management System 1.0's /panel/edit-appointment.php file. The 'editid' parameter is not properly sanitized before being used in SQL queries, allowing remote attackers to inject malicious SQL code and potentially exfiltrate or manipulate the database.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed application versionLocate the application files and check for version indicators such as a version.php file, README, or footer/version info. Common paths include the root directory or includes/ folder.Affected if The installed version is confirmed to be 1.0 of SourceCodester Best Salon Management System or Mayurik Best Salon Management System
-
Verify the vulnerable file existsCheck for the presence of /panel/edit-appointment.php in the web root directory. This file should exist in the application installation.Affected if The file /panel/edit-appointment.php is present on the server
-
Inspect the editid parameter handlingExamine the source code of /panel/edit-appointment.php and look for how the 'editid' GET or POST parameter is used in SQL queries. Search for patterns like $_GET['editid'] or $_POST['editid'] directly embedded in SQL statements without prepared statements or escaping functions.Affected if The 'editid' parameter is used directly in SQL queries without parameterization, input validation, or proper escaping
-
Confirm the application is reachable via HTTPDetermine if the web application is accessible over the network. Attempt to access the /panel/ directory or the edit-appointment.php file via a browser or curl request.Affected if The vulnerable endpoint is accessible from the network and the application is actively serving requests
You are affected if you are running SourceCodester Best Salon Management System version 1.0 and the /panel/edit-appointment.php file contains direct SQL query usage of the 'editid' parameter without prepared statements.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement prepared statements/parameterized queries for all database operations in edit-appointment.php and any other files handling user input. Apply input validation and output encoding. Consider deploying a WAF as a compensating control.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-11614 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-11614 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data